# Definition:Incommensurable

Jump to navigation
Jump to search

## Contents

## Definition

Let $a, b \in \R_{>0}$ be (strictly) positive real numbers.

$a$ and $b$ are **incommensurable** if and only if $\dfrac a b$ is irrational.

In the words of Euclid:

*Those magnitudes are said to be***commensurable**which are measured by the same same measure, and those**incommensurable**which cannot have any common measure.

(*The Elements*: Book $\text{X}$: Definition $1$)

## Notation

There appears to be no universally acknowledged symbol to denote commensurability.

Thomas L. Heath in his edition of *Euclid: The Thirteen Books of The Elements: Volume 3, 2nd ed.* makes the following suggestions:

- $(1): \quad$ To denote that $A$ is commensurable or commensurable in length with $B$:
- $A \mathop{\frown} B$

- $(2): \quad$ To denote that $A$ is commensurable in square with $B$:
- $A \mathop{\frown\!\!-} B$

- $(3): \quad$ To denote that $A$ is incommensurable or incommensurable in length with $B$:
- $A \mathop{\smile} B$

- $(4): \quad$ To denote that $A$ is incommensurable in square with $B$:
- $A \mathop{\smile\!\!-} B$

This convention may be used on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ if accompanied by a note which includes a link to this page.

## Also known as

When used in the context of linear measure, the term **incommensurable in length** can be used, in order to distinguish explicitly from incommensurability in square.