Equivalence of Formulations of Lagrange Interpolation Formula
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
The following statements are equivalent:
Formulation $1$
Let $\tuple {x_0, \ldots, x_n}$ and $\tuple {a_0, \ldots, a_n}$ be ordered tuples of real numbers such that $x_i \ne x_j$ for $i \ne j$.
Then there exists a unique polynomial $P \in \R \sqbrk X$ of degree at most $n$ such that:
- $\map P {x_i} = a_i$ for all $i \in \set {0, 1, \ldots, n}$
Moreover $P$ is given by the formula:
- $\ds \map P X = \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n a_i \map {L_j} X$
where $\map {L_j} X$ is the $j$th Lagrange basis polynomial associated to the $x_i$.
Formulation $2$
Let $\tuple {x_0, \ldots, x_n}$ and $\tuple {a_0, \ldots, a_n}$ be ordered tuples of real numbers such that $x_i \ne x_j$ for $i \ne j$.
Then there exists a unique polynomial $P \in \R \sqbrk X$ of degree at most $n$ such that:
- $\map P {x_i} = a_i$ for all $i \in \set {0, 1, \ldots, n}$
Moreover $P$ is given by the formula:
- $\ds \map P X = \sum_{j \mathop = 0}^n a_i \map {L_j} X$
where $\map {L_j} X$ is the $j$th Lagrange basis polynomial associated to the $x_i$.
Proof
![]() | This theorem requires a proof. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by crafting such a proof. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{ProofWanted}} from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page. |
Sources
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Lagrange's interpolation formula
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Lagrange's interpolation formula