Frege Set Theory is Logically Inconsistent

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


The system of axiomatic set theory that is Frege set theory is inconsistent.


From Russell's Paradox, the comprehension principle leads to a contradiction.

Let $q$ be such a contradiction:

$q = p \land \neg p$

for some statement $p$.

From the Rule of Explosion it then follows that every logical formula is a provable consequence of $q$.

Hence the result, by definition of inconsistent.