Henry Ernest Dudeney/Modern Puzzles/222 - A Mechanical Paradox/Solution
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Modern Puzzles by Henry Ernest Dudeney: $222$
- A Mechanical Paradox
- A remarkable mechanical paradox, invented by James Ferguson about the year $1751$, ought to be known by everyone, but, unfortunately, it is not.
- It was contrived by him as a challenge to a sceptical watchmaker during a metaphysical controversy.
- "Suppose," Ferguson said, "I make one wheel as thick as three others and cut teeth in them all,
- and then put the three wheels all loose upon one axis and set the thick wheel to turn them,
- so that its teeth may take into those of the three thin ones.
- Now, if I turn the thick wheel round, how must it turn the others?"
- The watchmaker replied that it was obvious that all three must be turned the contrary way.
- Then Ferguson produced his simple machine, which anyone can make in a few hours,
- showing that, turning the thick wheel which way you would,
- one of the thin wheels revolved in the same way, the second the contrary way, and the third remained stationary.
- Although the watchmaker took the machine away for careful examination, he failed to detect the cause of the strange paradox.
Solution
- The machine shown in our diagram consist of two pieces of thin wood, $B$ and $C$, made into a frame by being joined at the corners.
- This frame, by means of the handle $n$, may be turned round an axle $a$, which pierces the frame and is fixed in a stationary board or table, $A$,
- and carries within the frame an immovable wheel.
- This first wheel, $D$, when the frame revolves, turns a second and thick wheel, $E$,
- which, like the remaining three wheels, $F$, $G$ and $H$, moves freely on its axis.
- The thin wheels, $F$, $G$ and $H$, are driven by the wheel $E$ in such a manner that when the frame revolves
- $H$ turns the same way as $E$ does,
- $G$ turns the contrary way,
- and $F$ remains stationary.
- The secret lies in the fact that though the wheels may be all of the same diameter,
- and $D$, $E$ and $F$ may ($D$ and $F$ must) have an equal number of teeth,
- yet $G$ must have at least one tooth fewer, and $H$ at least one tooth more, than $D$.
Sources
- 1926: Henry Ernest Dudeney: Modern Puzzles ... (previous): Solutions: $222$. -- A Mechanical Paradox
- 1968: Henry Ernest Dudeney: 536 Puzzles & Curious Problems ... (previous) ... (next): Answers: $296$. A Mechanical Paradox