Hilbert Proof System Instance 2 Independence Results
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![]() | This page has been identified as a candidate for refactoring of advanced complexity. In particular: Experimental setup, we don't have anything like this yet. Subpages, categories, etc. should be considered. Until this has been finished, please leave {{Refactor}} in the code.
New contributors: Refactoring is a task which is expected to be undertaken by experienced editors only. Because of the underlying complexity of the work needed, it is recommended that you do not embark on a refactoring task until you have become familiar with the structural nature of pages of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Refactor}} from the code. |
Theorem
Let $\mathscr H_2$ be Instance 2 of the Hilbert proof systems.
Then the following independence results hold:
Independence of $(A1)$
Axiom $(A1)$ is independent from $(A2)$, $(A3)$, $(A4)$.
Independence of $(A2)$
Axiom $(A2)$ is independent from $(A1)$, $(A3)$, $(A4)$.
Independence of $(A3)$
Axiom $(A3)$ is independent from $(A1)$, $(A2)$, $(A4)$.
Independence of $(A4)$
Axiom $(\text A 4)$ is independent from $(\text A 1)$, $(\text A 2)$, $(\text A 3)$.
$RST \, 4$ is Derivable
Rule of inference $RST \, 4$ is derivable from $RST \, 1, RST \, 2, RST \, 3$ and the axioms $(A1)$ through $(A4)$.
Sources
- 1959: A.H. Basson and D.J. O'Connor: Introduction to Symbolic Logic (3rd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 4.6$: Independence