Non-Empty Bounded Subset of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element/Proof 2
< Non-Empty Bounded Subset of Minimally Inductive Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $M$ be a class which is minimally inductive under a progressing mapping $g$.
Then every non-empty bounded subset of $M$ has a greatest element.
Proof
A minimally inductive class under $g$ is the same thing as a minimally closed class under $g$ with respect to $\O$.
The result then follows by a direct application of Bounded Subset of Minimally Closed Class under Progressing Mapping has Greatest Element.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 2010: Raymond M. Smullyan and Melvin Fitting: Set Theory and the Continuum Problem (revised ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $3$: The Natural Numbers: $\S 4$ A double induction principle and its applications: Exercise $4.1$