Non-Equivalence as Disjunction of Conjunctions/Formulation 1/Reverse Implication
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
- $\left({\neg p \land q}\right) \lor \left({p \land \neg q}\right) \vdash \neg \left ({p \iff q}\right)$
Proof
By the tableau method of natural deduction:
Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | $\paren {\neg p \land q} \lor \paren {p \land \neg q}$ | Premise | (None) | ||
2 | 1 | $\paren {p \land \neg q} \lor \paren {\neg p \land q}$ | Sequent Introduction | 1 | Disjunction is Commutative | |
3 | 1 | $\paren {p \land \neg q} \lor \paren {q \land \neg p}$ | Sequent Introduction | 2 | Conjunction is Commutative | |
4 | 1 | $\paren {\neg \neg p \land \neg q} \lor \paren {\neg \neg q \land \neg p}$ | Double Negation Introduction: $\neg \neg \II$ | 3 | ||
5 | 1 | $\neg \paren {\neg p \lor q} \lor \neg \paren {\neg q \lor p}$ | Sequent Introduction | 4 | De Morgan's Laws: Conjunction of Negations | |
6 | 1 | $\neg \paren {\paren {\neg p \lor q} \land \paren {\neg q \lor p} }$ | Sequent Introduction | 5 | De Morgan's Laws: Disjunction of Negations | |
7 | 1 | $\neg \paren {\paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies p} }$ | Sequent Introduction | 6 | Rule of Material Implication (twice) | |
8 | 1 | $\neg \paren {p \iff q}$ | Sequent Introduction | 7 | Rule of Material Equivalence |
$\blacksquare$