Non-Zero Integers are Cancellable for Multiplication
Theorem
Every non-zero integer is cancellable for multiplication.
That is:
- $\forall x, y, z \in \Z, x \ne 0: x y = x z \iff y = z$
Proof 1
Let $x y = x z$.
There are two cases to investigate: $x > 0$ and $x < 0$.
Let $x > 0$.
From Natural Numbers are Non-Negative Integers, $x \in \N_{> 0}$.
By the Extension Theorem for Distributive Operations and Ordering on Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication, $x$ is cancellable for multiplication.
$\Box$
Let $x < 0$.
We know that the Integers form Integral Domain and are thus a ring.
Then $-x > 0$ and so:
\(\ds \paren {-x} y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds -\paren {x y}\) | Product with Ring Negative | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds -\paren {x z}\) | $\struct {\Z, +}$ is a group: Group Axiom $\text G 3$: Existence of Inverse Element | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {-x} z\) | Product with Ring Negative | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds z\) | from above: case where $x > 0$ |
$\Box$
So whatever non-zero value $x$ takes, it is cancellable for multiplication.
$\blacksquare$
Proof 2
Let $y, z \in \Z: y \ne z$.
\(\ds y\) | \(\ne\) | \(\ds z\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadstoandfrom \ \ \) | \(\ds y - z\) | \(\ne\) | \(\ds 0\) | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadstoandfrom \ \ \) | \(\ds x \paren {y - z}\) | \(\ne\) | \(\ds 0\) | Ring of Integers has no Zero Divisors | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadstoandfrom \ \ \) | \(\ds x y - x z\) | \(\ne\) | \(\ds 0\) | Integer Multiplication Distributes over Subtraction |
The result follows by transposition.
$\blacksquare$
Proof 3
Let $x y = x z$.
There are two cases to investigate: $x > 0$ and $x < 0$.
Let $x > 0$.
From Natural Numbers are Non-Negative Integers, $x \in \N_{> 0}$.
By the Extension Theorem for Distributive Operations and Ordering on Natural Numbers is Compatible with Multiplication, $x$ is cancellable for multiplication. {{qed|lemma}
Let $x < 0$.
We know that the Integers form Integral Domain and are thus a ring.
Then $-x > 0$ and so:
\(\ds x y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x z\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \paren {-\paren {-x} } y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {-\paren {-x} } z\) | Negative of Ring Negative | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds -\paren {\paren {-x} y}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds -\paren {\paren {-x} z}\) | Product with Ring Negative | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds -y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds -z\) | as $-x$ is (strictly) positive, the above result holds | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds y\) | \(=\) | \(\ds z\) | $\struct {\Z, +}$ is a group: Group Axiom $\text G 3$: Existence of Inverse Element |
$\Box$
So whatever non-zero value $x$ takes, it is cancellable for multiplication.
$\blacksquare$
Also known as
Some sources give this as the cancellation law, but this term is already in use in the context of a group.
Sources
- 1951: Nathan Jacobson: Lectures in Abstract Algebra: Volume $\text { I }$: Basic Concepts ... (previous) ... (next): Introduction $\S 5$: The system of integers