Strict Upper Bound for Composition of Ackermann-Péter Functions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
For all $x, y, z \in \N$:
- $\map A {x + y + 2, z} > \map A {x, \map A {y, z}}$
where $A$ is the Ackermann-Péter function.
Proof
We have:
- $x + y + 1 > y$
giving us:
- $\paren 1 \quad \map A {x + y + 1, z} > \map A {y, z}$
by Ackermann-Péter Function is Strictly Increasing on First Argument.
Therefore:
\(\ds \map A {x + y + 2, z}\) | \(\ge\) | \(\ds \map A {x + y + 1, z + 1}\) | Increasing Second Argument of Ackermann-Péter Function is Not Greater than Increasing First Argument | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map A {x + y, \map A {x + y + 1, z} }\) | Definition of Ackermann-Péter Function | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(>\) | \(\ds \map A {x + y, \map A {y, z} }\) | Ackermann-Péter Function is Strictly Increasing on Second Argument and $\paren 1$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\ge\) | \(\ds \map A {x, \map A {y, z} }\) | Ackermann-Péter Function is Strictly Increasing on First Argument |
$\blacksquare$