User:Leigh.Samphier/Matroids/Dual Matroid is Matroid
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![]() | This page needs proofreading. Please check it for mathematical errors. If you believe there are none, please remove {{Proofread}} from the code.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Proofread}} from the code. |
Theorem
Let $M = \struct {S, \mathscr I}$ be a matroid.
Then the dual $M^*$ of $M$ is a matroid.
Proof
Let $\mathscr B$ be the set of bases of the matroid $M$.
By definition of dual matroid:
- $M^*$ is the matroid whose bases is the set:
- $\mathscr B^* = \set{S \setminus B : B \in \mathscr B}$
It is to be proved that there indeed exists a matroid whose set of bases is $\mathscr B^*$.
From Matroid Bases Iff Satisfies Formulation 1 of Matroid Base Axiom, it is sufficient to show that:
- $\mathscr B^*$ satisfies formulation 1 base axiom.
Let $B^*_1, B^*_2 \in \mathscr B^*$.
By definition of $\mathscr B^*$:
- $\exists B_1, B_2 \in \mathscr B$:
- $B^*_1 = S \setminus B_1$
- $B^*_2 = S \setminus B_2$
Let $x \in B^*_1 \setminus B^*_2$.
We have:
\(\ds B^*_1 \setminus B^*_2\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren{S \setminus B_1} \setminus \paren{S \setminus B_2}\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds B_2 \setminus B_1\) | Set Difference of Complements |
And similarly:
- $B^*_2 \setminus B^*_1 = B_1 \setminus B_2$
Hence:
- $x \in B_2 \setminus B_1$
From User:Leigh.Samphier/Matroids/Matroid Bases Satisfy Formulation 4 Base Axiom:
- $\exists y \in B_1 \setminus B_2 : \paren{B_1 \setminus \set y} \cup \set x \in \mathscr B$
Hence:
- $y \in B^*_2 \setminus B^*_1$
We have:
\(\ds S \setminus \paren{\paren{B_1 \setminus \set y} \cup \set x}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds S \setminus \paren{\paren{B_1 \setminus \set y} \cup \paren{S \cap \set x} }\) | Intersection with Subset is Subset | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren{S \setminus \paren{B_1 \setminus \set y} } \setminus \set x\) | Set Difference with Set Difference is Union of Set Difference with Intersection | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren{\paren{S \setminus B_1}\cup \paren{ S \cap \set y} } \setminus \set x\) | Set Difference with Set Difference is Union of Set Difference with Intersection | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren{\paren{S \setminus B_1}\cup \set y} \setminus \set x\) | Intersection with Subset is Subset | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren{B^*_1 \cup \set y} \setminus \set x\) | Definition of $B^*_1$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren{B^*_1 \setminus \set x} \cup \set y\) | Corollary of Set Difference Then Union Equals Union Then Set Difference |
Hence:
- $\paren{B^*_1 \setminus \set x} \cup \set y \in \mathscr B^*$
It follows that $\mathscr B^*$ satisfies formulation 1 base axiom.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1976: Dominic Welsh: Matroid Theory Chapter $2.$ $\S 1.$ The Dual Matroid, Theorem $1$
- 2011: James Oxley: Matroid Theory (2nd ed.) Chapter $2.$ Duality, $\S 2.1.$ The definition and basic properties, Theorem $2.1.1$