Valid Syllogisms in Figure IV
Theorem
Let $Q$ be a valid categorical syllogism in Figure $\text {IV}$.
Then it is a necessary condition that:
- $(1): \quad$ Either:
- the major premise of $Q$ be a negative categorical statement
- or:
- the minor premise of $Q$ be a universal categorical statement
- or both.
- $(2): \quad$ If the conclusion of $Q$ be a negative categorical statement, then the major premise of $Q$ be a universal categorical statement.
- $(3): \quad$ If the conclusion of $Q$ be a universal categorical statement, then the minor premise of $Q$ be a negative categorical statement.
Proof
Consider Figure $\text {IV}$:
Major Premise: | $\map {\mathbf \Phi_1} {P, M}$ |
Minor Premise: | $\map {\mathbf \Phi_2} {M, S}$ |
Conclusion: | $\map {\mathbf \Phi_3} {S, P}$ |
Let the major premise of $Q$ be denoted $\text{Maj}$.
Let the minor premise of $Q$ be denoted $\text{Min}$.
Let the conclusion of $Q$ be denoted $\text{C}$.
$M$ is:
We have:
So, in order for $M$ to be distributed, either:
- From Negative Categorical Statement Distributes its Predicate: $\text{Maj}$ must be negative
or:
- From Universal Categorical Statement Distributes its Subject: $\text{Min}$ must be universal.
Both may be the case.
Thus $(1)$ is seen to hold.
$\Box$
Let $\text{C}$ be a negative categorical statement.
From Negative Categorical Statement Distributes its Predicate:
- $P$ is distributed in $\text{C}$.
From Distributed Term of Conclusion of Valid Categorical Syllogism is Distributed in Premise:
- $P$ is distributed in $\text{Maj}$.
So from Universal Categorical Statement Distributes its Subject:
- $\text{Maj}$ is a universal categorical statement.
Thus $(2)$ is seen to hold.
$\Box$
Let $\text{C}$ be a universal categorical statement.
From Universal Categorical Statement Distributes its Subject:
- $S$ is distributed in $\text{C}$.
From Distributed Term of Conclusion of Valid Categorical Syllogism is Distributed in Premise:
- $S$ is distributed in $\text{Min}$.
From Negative Categorical Statement Distributes its Predicate:
- $S$ is a negative categorical statement.
Thus $(3)$ is seen to hold.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1965: E.J. Lemmon: Beginning Logic ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $4$: The Predicate Calculus $2$: $4$ The Syllogism