De Morgan's Laws (Predicate Logic)/Assertion of Existence
< De Morgan's Laws (Predicate Logic)(Redirected from Assertion of Existence)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $\forall$ and $\exists$ denote the universal quantifier and existential quantifier respectively.
Then:
- $\neg \paren {\forall x: \neg \map P x} \dashv \vdash \exists x: \map P x$
- If not everything is not, there exists something that is.
Proof
By the tableau method of natural deduction:
Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | $\neg \paren {\forall x: \neg \map P x}$ | Premise | (None) | ||
2 | 2 | $\neg \paren {\exists x: \map P x}$ | Assumption | (None) | ||
3 | 2 | $\forall x: \neg \map P x$ | Sequent Introduction | 2 | Denial of Existence | |
4 | 1, 2 | $\bot$ | Principle of Non-Contradiction: $\neg \EE$ | 1, 3 | ||
5 | 1 | $\exists x: \map P x$ | Reductio ad Absurdum | 2 – 4 | Assumption 2 has been discharged |
$\Box$
By the tableau method of natural deduction:
Line | Pool | Formula | Rule | Depends upon | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | $\exists x: \map P x$ | Premise | (None) | ||
2 | 2 | $\forall x: \neg \map P x$ | Assumption | (None) | ||
3 | 1 | $\map P {\mathbf a}$ | Existential Instantiation | 1 | ||
4 | 2 | $\neg \map P {\mathbf a}$ | Universal Instantiation | 2 | ||
5 | 1, 2 | $\bot$ | Principle of Non-Contradiction: $\neg \EE$ | 3, 4 | ||
6 | 1 | $\neg \paren {\forall x: \neg \map P x}$ | Proof by Contradiction: $\neg \II$ | 2 – 5 | Assumption 2 has been discharged |
$\blacksquare$
Law of the Excluded Middle
This theorem depends on the Law of the Excluded Middle, by way of Reductio ad Absurdum.
This is one of the logical axioms that was determined by Aristotle, and forms part of the backbone of classical (Aristotelian) logic.
However, the intuitionist school rejects the Law of the Excluded Middle as a valid logical axiom.
This in turn invalidates this theorem from an intuitionistic perspective.
Source of Name
This entry was named for Augustus De Morgan.
Sources
- 1965: E.J. Lemmon: Beginning Logic ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $4$: The Predicate Calculus $2$: $4$ The Syllogism: $150$
- 1980: D.J. O'Connor and Betty Powell: Elementary Logic ... (previous) ... (next): $\S \text{III}$: The Logic of Predicates $(1): \ 3$: Quantifiers: Relations between quantifiers $3$
- 1982: P.M. Cohn: Algebra Volume 1 (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Sets and mappings: $\S 1.1$: The need for logic
- 1993: Keith Devlin: The Joy of Sets: Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: Naive Set Theory: $\S 1.1$: What is a Set?
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): quantifier
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): quantifier