Bertrand's Theorem/Asymptotic Proof
![]() | This article needs to be linked to other articles. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by adding these links. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{MissingLinks}} from the code. |
Theorem
Let $U: \R_{>0} \to \R$ be analytic for $r > 0$.
Let $M > 0$ be a nonvanishing angular momentum such that a stable circular orbit exists.
Suppose that every orbit sufficiently close to the circular orbit is closed.
Then $U$ is either $k r^2$ or $-\dfrac k r$ (for $k > 0$) up to an additive constant.
Proof
Preliminary Lemma
For simplicity we set $m = 1$, so that the effective potential becomes:
- $U_M = U + \dfrac {M^2} {2 r^2}$
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: What is $m$ in this context? You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Consider the apsidial angle:
- $\ds \Phi = \sqrt 2 \int_{r_\min}^{r_\max} \frac {M \rd r} {r^2 \sqrt {E - U_M} }$
where:
- $E$ is the energy
- $r_\min, r_\max$ are solutions to $\map {U_M} r = E$.
By definition, this is the angle between adjacent apocenters (pericenters).
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: Apocenters or pericenters? Or either? This could be clarified. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Recall that if $\Phi$ is commensurable with $\pi$, then an orbit is closed.
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: Link to a proof demonstrating this. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
$\Box$
The substitution $x = M / r$ gives:
- $\ds \Phi = \sqrt 2 \int_{x_\min}^{x_\max} \frac {\d x} {\sqrt {E - \map W x}}$
where $\map W x \equiv \map U {\dfrac M x} + \dfrac 1 2 x^2$.
In general, the frequency of oscillations around a stable equilibrium at $x = x_0$ for a particle of mass $m$ in a potential $V$ is given by:
- $\omega = \sqrt {\dfrac {\map {V} {x_0} } m}$
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: Provide a link to a proof of the above, and explain what $m$ is. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
which means that:
- $\Phi \approx 2 \pi \dfrac M {x_0^2} \sqrt {\map {W} {x_0} } = 2 \pi \sqrt {\dfrac {U'} {3 U' + x_0 U} }$
Suppose $\Phi$ were constant.
Then the solutions are:
- $\map U r = k r^\alpha, \alpha \ge - 2, \alpha \ne 0$
and:
- $\map U r = b \log r$
Therefore:
- $\Phi = \dfrac {2 \pi} {\sqrt{\alpha + 2}}$
with $\alpha = 0$ corresponding to the logarithmic solution.
This is discarded, since in that case $\Phi$ is not commensurable with $\pi$.
Now consider $\alpha > 0$, so that $\map U r \to \infty$ as $r \to \infty$.
The substitution $x = y x_\max$ reduces $\Phi$ to:
- $\ds \Phi = \sqrt 2 \int_{y_\min}^1 \frac {\d y} {\sqrt {\map W 1 - \map W y} }$
where:
- $\map W y \equiv \dfrac {y^2} 2 + \dfrac 1 { {x_\max}^2} \map U {\dfrac M {y x_\max} }$
Therefore, when $E \to \infty$:
- $x_\max \to \infty$ and $y_\min \to 0$
This means that:
- $\ds \lim_{E \mathop \to \infty} \Phi = \pi$
Equating this with the previous result gives:
- $\dfrac {2 \pi} {\sqrt {\alpha + 2}} = \pi$
Therefore:
- $\alpha=2$
Now let $\map U r = -k r^{-\beta}, 0 < \beta < 2$.
A similar approach gives:
- $\ds \lim_{E \mathop \to -0} \Phi = \frac {2 \pi} {2 - \beta}$
so that:
- $\dfrac {2 \pi} {2 + \alpha} = \dfrac {2 \pi} {\sqrt {2 + \alpha} }$
It follows that:
- $\alpha = -1$
and the result follows.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
![]() | This page may be the result of a refactoring operation. As such, the following source works, along with any process flow, will need to be reviewed. When this has been completed, the citation of that source work (if it is appropriate that it stay on this page) is to be placed above this message, into the usual chronological ordering. If you have access to any of these works, then you are invited to review this list, and make any necessary corrections. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{SourceReview}} from the code. |
- 1974: V.I. Arnold: Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics: $\S 2.\text D$, problems $1$. to $6$.