Definition:Definable/Element
Definition
Let $\MM$ be an $\LL$-structure with universe $M$.
Let $A$ be a subset of $M$.
Let $\bar b$ be an ordered $n$-tuple of elements from $M$.
Let $\LL_A$ be the language formed by adding constant symbols to $\LL$ for each element of $A$.
$\bar b$ is definable over $A$ if there is an $\LL_A$-formula $\map \phi {\bar x}$ with $n$ free variables such that the set $\set {\bar m \in M^n :\MM \models \map \phi {\bar m} }$ contains $\bar b$ but nothing else.
Also defined as
![]() | This page has been identified as a candidate for refactoring of medium complexity. In particular: Extract this into a separate definition, with its appropriate constraints Until this has been finished, please leave {{Refactor}} in the code.
New contributors: Refactoring is a task which is expected to be undertaken by experienced editors only. Because of the underlying complexity of the work needed, it is recommended that you do not embark on a refactoring task until you have become familiar with the structural nature of pages of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Refactor}} from the code. |
The following definition is sometimes used.
It is not equivalent in general.
However, these definitions are equivalent when working in a saturated model.
This is proved in Definable iff Singleton Orbit.
- $\bar b$ is definable over $A$ if every $A$-automorphism is an $A, b$-automorphism.
Sources
- 1971: Gaisi Takeuti and Wilson M. Zaring: Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory: $\S 4.15$