Definition:Group Presentation
- Not to be confused with Definition:Group Representation.
Informal definition
Let $G$ be a group.
A (group) presentation for $G$ is a definition in the form:
- $G = \gen {a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n: w_1 = e, w_2 = e, \ldots, w_k = e}$
where:
- $a_1, a_2, \ldots, a_n$ is a list of generators of $G$
- $w_1 = e, w_2 = e, \ldots, w_k = e$ is a list of equations specifying relations between powers of these generators.
Definition
Let $G$ be a group.
A (group) presentation for $G$ is a triple $\tuple {S, R, f}$ where:
- $S$ is a set
- $R$ is a set of relations on $S$
- $f: \gen {S \mid R} \to G$ is a group isomorphism from the group defined by $\struct {S, R}$.
Relations
The standard form of a relation in a group presentation is:
- $w = e$
where $w$ is a word in the group.
Comment
![]() | This page has been identified as a candidate for refactoring of advanced complexity. In particular: While this comment provides valuable insight, it needs to be properly incorporated into a sensible page structure around group presentations and presentations of groups Until this has been finished, please leave {{Refactor}} in the code.
New contributors: Refactoring is a task which is expected to be undertaken by experienced editors only. Because of the underlying complexity of the work needed, it is recommended that you do not embark on a refactoring task until you have become familiar with the structural nature of pages of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Refactor}} from the code. |
We defined the notation $\gen S$ to be the group generated by $S$ where $S \subseteq G$. This is the subgroup of $G$ which is generated by $S$.
However, here we have taken the concept of $\gen S$ out of the context of the group of which $S$ is a subset, and used it to define a group from first principles.
When $S \subseteq G$, where $G$ and its elements are well-defined, the relations between the elements of $G$ are all documented and understood. However, when using $\gen S$ to define a group, there are no relations between the elements until we define them. In fact, in a truly abstract sense, neither are the elements of $S$ defined in the context of $G$ except from their membership of $S$ and their relationships between each other.
Also see
- Results about group presentations can be found here.
Sources
- 1996: John F. Humphreys: A Course in Group Theory ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $4$: Subgroups: Example $4.10$
- 2000: Pierre A. Grillet: Abstract Algebra: $\S \text{I}.7$: Presentations