Definition:Integral Sign
![]() | This page has been identified as a candidate for refactoring of medium complexity. In particular: Expand the definition of this to include conventional Riemann integration -- many undergraduates will not have encountered the terminology of measure theory and the Lebesgue integral. Until this has been finished, please leave {{Refactor}} in the code.
New contributors: Refactoring is a task which is expected to be undertaken by experienced editors only. Because of the underlying complexity of the work needed, it is recommended that you do not embark on a refactoring task until you have become familiar with the structural nature of pages of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Refactor}} from the code. |
Definition
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a measure space.
Let:
- $\ds \int f \rd \mu := \sup \set {\map {I_\mu} g: g \le f, g \in \EE^+}$
denote the $\mu$-integral of the positive measurable function $f$. where:
- $\MM_{\overline \R}^+$ denotes the space of positive $\Sigma$-measurable functions
- $\overline \R_{\ge 0}$ denotes the positive extended real numbers
- $\sup$ is a supremum in the extended real ordering
- $\map {I_\mu} g$ denotes the $\mu$-integral of the positive simple function $g$
- $g \le f$ denotes pointwise inequality
- $\EE^+$ denotes the space of positive simple functions.
The symbol:
- $\ds \int \ldots \rd \mu$
is called the integral sign.
Note that there are two parts to this symbol, which embrace the function $f$ which is being integrated.
Historical Note
The integral sign $\ds \int \ldots \rd x$ originated with Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz
In a manuscript dated $29$th October $1675$ he introduced a long letter $S$ to suggest the first letter of the word summa (Latin for sum).
At the time he was using the notation $\operatorname {omn} l$ (that is: omnes lineae, meaning all lines).
Then he noted:
- It will be useful to write $\int$ for $\operatorname {omn}$, thus $\int l$ for $\operatorname {omn} l$, that is, the sum of those $l$'s.
At the same time he introduced the differential symbol $\d$.
Thus he was soon writing $\d x$ and $\d y$, and $\ds \int \ldots \rd x$ soon followed.
In his $1684$ article Nova Methodus pro Maximis et Minimis, published in Acta Eruditorum, he casually drops the notation in place with very little explanation.
Sources
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): integration
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): integral sign
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): integration