# Definition:Integral Sign

This page has been identified as a candidate for refactoring.Expand the definition of this to include conventional Riemann integration -- many undergraduates will not have encountered the terminology of measure theory and the Lebesgue integral.Until this has been finished, please leave
`{{Refactor}}` in the code.
Because of the underlying complexity of the work needed, it is recommended that you do not embark on a refactoring task until you have become familiar with the structural nature of pages of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of `{{Refactor}}` from the code. |

## Definition

Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a measure space.

Let:

- $\ds \int f \rd \mu := \sup \set {\map {I_\mu} g: g \le f, g \in \EE^+}$

denote the $\mu$-integral of the positive measurable function $f$. where:

- $\MM_{\overline \R}^+$ denotes the space of positive $\Sigma$-measurable functions

- $\overline \R_{\ge 0}$ denotes the positive extended real numbers

- $\sup$ is a supremum in the extended real ordering

- $\map {I_\mu} g$ denotes the $\mu$-integral of the positive simple function $g$

- $g \le f$ denotes pointwise inequality

- $\EE^+$ denotes the space of positive simple functions.

The symbol:

- $\ds \int \ldots \rd \mu$

is called the **integral sign**.

Note that there are two parts to this symbol, which embrace the function $f$ which is being integrated.

## Historical Note

The integral sign $\ds \int \ldots \rd x$ originated with Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz

In a manuscript dated $29$th October $1675$ he introduced a long letter $S$ to suggest the first letter of the word **summa** (Latin for **sum**).

At the time he was using the notation $\operatorname {omn} l$ (that is: **omnes lineae**, meaning **all lines**).

Then he noted:

*It will be useful to write $\int$ for $\operatorname {omn}$, thus $\int l$ for $\operatorname {omn} l$, that is, the sum of those $l$'s.*

At the same time he introduced the differential symbol $\d$.

Thus he was soon writing $\d x$ and $\d y$, and $\ds \int \ldots \rd x$ soon followed.

In his $1684$ article *Nova Methodus pro Maximis et Minimis*, published in *Acta Eruditorum*, he casually drops the notation in place with very little explanation.