Definition:Transitive Relation

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Definition

Let $\RR \subseteq S \times S$ be a relation in $S$.


Definition 1

$\RR$ is a transitive relation if and only if:

$\tuple {x, y} \in \RR \land \tuple {y, z} \in \RR \implies \tuple {x, z} \in \RR$

that is:

$\set {\tuple {x, y}, \tuple {y, z} } \subseteq \RR \implies \tuple {x, z} \in \RR$


Definition 2

$\RR$ is a transitive relation if and only if:

$\RR \circ \RR \subseteq \RR$

where $\circ$ denotes composite relation.


Class Theory

In the context of class theory, the definition follows the same lines:

Let $V$ be a basic universe.

Let $\RR \subseteq V \times V$ be a relation in $V$.


$\RR$ is a transitive relation if and only if:

$\tuple {x, y} \in \RR \land \tuple {y, z} \in \RR \implies \tuple {x, z} \in \RR$

that is:

$\set {\tuple {x, y}, \tuple {y, z} } \subseteq \RR \implies \tuple {x, z} \in \RR$


Examples

Ancestor Relation

Let $P$ be the set of people.

Let $\sim$ be the relation on $P$ defined as:

$\forall \tuple {x, y} \in P \times P: x \sim y \iff \text { $x$ is an ancestor of $y$}$

Then $\sim$ is a transitive relation.


Greater Than on Real Numbers

Let $>$ denote the greater than relation on the set of real numbers $\R$.

Then $>$ is a transitive relation, but neither reflexive nor symmetric.


Less Than on Real Numbers

Let $<$ be the usual ordering on the set of real numbers $\R$.

Then $<$ is a transitive relation, but neither reflexive nor symmetric.


Also see

  • Results about transitive relation can be found here.