Definition talk:Cartesian Product of Relations

I wouldn't delete it -- it's cromulent enough, it's just the cartesian product of relations. I'm not even too worried that there are no sources, as it's simply enough derived from existing definitions.

The fact that it needs tidying and completing is just one of those things which no doubt someone will get round to sometime ... :-) --prime mover (talk) 15:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Fair enough. — Lord_Farin (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)