Definition talk:Power of Ideal of Ring
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
I'm not sure how to create discussion posts exactly so I am making an attempt here (sorry, I am quite new).
I am curious as to what is unclear about the notation $a_{i,j}$ as a double index notation.
- It's obscure and needs further explanation. It has to be made explicit what $a_{i,j}$ is an element of for a start. --prime mover (talk) 23:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- The point is that all concepts on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ need to link back to the definitions. It is the fundamental philosophical raison d'etre of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.
- A further point that needs to be reconciled at some stage is that we haven't yet defined double indexing sets on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$. Such is an omission that needs to be addressed at some stage.
Also, what is this "In particular: assuming more definitions to come, one per page?" Am I expected to make more pages for something?
- I saw the "definition 1" and so naturally assumed there's going to be a "definition 2" and so on. --prime mover (talk) 23:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Refactoring is now complete.
Finally, what is meant by "including category" at the top where it says this article should be linked in some places?
- Compare and contrast other pages. You'll get the hang in due course. Or not. --prime mover (talk) 23:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- Also note my point about linking back to definitions. No page is complete unless every concept has a link back to its definition. --prime mover (talk) 08:53, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
My end goal is to basically fix the page Radical of Power of Prime Ideal if that is of any help.