Disjoint Compact Sets in Hausdorff Space have Disjoint Neighborhoods
Theorem
Let $T = \struct {S, \tau}$ be a Hausdorff space.
Let $V_1$ and $V_2$ be compact sets in $T$.
Then $V_1$ and $V_2$ have disjoint neighborhoods.
Lemma
Let $\struct {S, \tau}$ be a Hausdorff space.
Let $C$ be a compact subspace of $S$.
Let $x \in S \setminus C$.
Then there exist open sets $U$ and $V$ such that $x \in U$, $C \subseteq V$, and $U \cap V = \O$.
Proof 1
Let $\FF$ be the set of all ordered pairs $\tuple {Z, W}$ such that:
- $Z, W \in \tau$
- $V_1 \subseteq Z$
- $Z \cap W = \O$
By the lemma, $\Img \FF$ covers $V_2$.
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: It is not clear what mapping or relation $\Img \FF$ refers to. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
By the definition of compact space, there exists a finite subset $K$ of $\Img \FF$ which also covers $V_2$.
By the definition of topology, $\ds \bigcup K$ is open.
By the Principle of Finite Choice, there exists a bijection $\GG \subseteq \FF$ such that $\Img \GG = K$.
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Then $\GG$, and hence its preimage, will be finite.
Let $\ds J = \bigcap \Preimg \GG$.
By Intersection is Largest Subset, $V_1 \subseteq J$.
By the definition of a topology, $J$ is open.
Then $\ds \bigcup K$ and $J$ are disjoint open sets such that $\ds V_2 \subseteq \bigcup K$ and $V_1 \subseteq J$.
$\blacksquare$
Proof 2
We first suppose that $V_1 = \set x$ and $x \not \in V_2$.
Since $T$ is Hausdorff:
- for each $y \in V_2$ there exists an open neighborhood $O^1_y$ of $x$ and an open neighborhood $O^2_y$ of $y$ such that $O^1_y \cap O^2_y = \O$.
Hence we have:
- $\ds V_2 \subseteq \bigcup_{y \mathop \in V_2} O_y^2$
Since $V_2$ is compact, there exists $y_1, \ldots, y_n \in V_2$ such that:
- $\ds V_2 \subseteq \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n O_{y_i}^2$
Now let:
- $\ds U_2 = \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n O_{y_i}^2$
and:
- $\ds U_1 = \bigcap_{i \mathop = 1}^n O_{y_i}^1$
We have that $U_1$ and $U_2$ are open, $x \in U_1$ and $V_2 \subseteq U_2$.
Further, if $x \in U_2$ then $x \in O_{y_i}^2$ for some $i$.
Since $O_{y_i}^2 \cap O_{y_i}^1 = \O$, it follows that $x \not \in O_{y_i}^1$.
Hence $x \not \in U_1$.
So $U_1 \cap U_2 = \O$.
Hence $U_1$ and $U_2$ are disjoint open sets with $V_1 \subseteq U_1$ and $V_2 \subseteq U_2$.
Hence we have proven the claim in the case $V_1 = \set x$.
Now take $V_1$ to be general.
For each $x \in V_1$, there exists open sets $U_{1, x}$ and $U_{2, x}$ such that $U_{1, x} \cap U_{2, x} = \O$, $x \in U_{1, x}$ and $V_2 \subseteq U_{2, x}$.
In particular:
- $\ds V_1 \subseteq \bigcup_{x \in V_1} U_{1, x}$
Since $V_1$ is compact, there exists $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in V_1$ such that:
- $\ds V_1 \subseteq \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n U_{1, x_i}$
Now set:
- $\ds U_1 = \bigcup_{i \mathop = 1}^n U_{1, x_i}$
and:
- $\ds U_2 = \bigcap_{i \mathop = 1}^n U_{2, x_i}$
We have $U_1 \cap U_2 = \O$ by an identical argument to above.
Further, $U_1$ and $U_2$ are both open.
Since $V_2 \subseteq U_{2, x_i}$ for each $i$ it follows that $V_2 \subseteq U_2$.
Hence $U_1$ and $U_2$ are the desired open sets.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1978: Lynn Arthur Steen and J. Arthur Seebach, Jr.: Counterexamples in Topology (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Part $\text I$: Basic Definitions: Section $3$: Compactness: Compactness Properties and the $T_i$ Axioms