Equivalence of Definitions of Order Embedding/Definition 1 implies Definition 3

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

Let $\struct {S, \preceq_1}$ and $\struct {T, \preceq_2}$ be ordered sets.

Let $\phi: S \to T$ be a mapping.


Let $\phi: S \to T$ be an order embedding by Definition 1:

$\phi$ is an order embedding of $S$ into $T$ if and only if:

$\forall x, y \in S: x \preceq_1 y \iff \map \phi x \preceq_2 \map \phi y$


Then $\phi: S \to T$ is an order embedding by Definition 3:

$\phi$ is an order embedding of $S$ into $T$ if and only if both of the following conditions hold:

$(1): \quad \phi$ is an injection
$(2): \quad \forall x, y \in S: x \prec_1 y \iff \map \phi x \prec_2 \map \phi y$


Proof

Let $\phi$ be an order embedding by definition 1.

Then by definition:

$\forall x, y \in S: x \preceq_1 y \iff \map \phi x \preceq_2 \map \phi y$

$\phi$ is injective by Order Embedding is Injection.


It remains to be shown that:

$x \prec_1 y \iff \map \phi x \prec_2 \map \phi y$


Suppose first that $x \prec_1 y$.

Then $x \preceq_1 y$ and $x \ne y$.

Thus by the premise:

$\map \phi x \preceq_2 \map \phi y$

Since $\phi$ is injective:

$\map \phi x \ne \map \phi y$

Therefore:

$\map \phi x \prec_2 \map \phi y$


Suppose instead that $\map \phi x \prec_2 \map \phi y$

Then:

$\map \phi x \preceq_2 \map \phi y$

and:

$\map \phi x \ne \map \phi y$

By the premise:

$x \preceq_1 y$

By the substitutive property of equality:

$x \ne y$

Thus:

$x \prec_1 y$


Thus $\phi$ is an order embedding by definition 3.

$\blacksquare$


Sources