Fermat Number is not Cube
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
There exist no Fermat numbers which are cubes.
Proof 1
Direct consequence of Fermat Number is not Perfect Power.
$\blacksquare$
Proof 2
Let $1 + 2^n$ be a Fermat number.
Suppose $a^3 = 1 + 2^n$.
Since $1 + 2^n$ is odd, $a$ must also be odd.
Write $a = 2 m + 1$, where $m > 0$.
Then:
\(\ds 1 + 2^n\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \paren {2 m + 1}^3\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds 8 m^3 + 12 m^2 + 6 m + 1\) | Cube of Sum | |||||||||||
\(\ds 2^n\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 8 m^3 + 12 m^2 + 6 m\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds 2 m \paren {4 m^2 + 6 m + 3}\) |
Since $4 m^2 + 6 m + 3$ is odd and greater than $1$, it is not a power of $2$.
Hence the equation $a^3 = 1 + 2^n$ has no solution in the integers.
Thus there are no Fermat numbers which are cubes.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers ... (previous) ... (next): $257$
- 1997: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $257$