Image of Submodule under Linear Transformation is Submodule
Theorem
Let $\struct {R, +_R, \times_R}$ be a ring.
Let $\struct {G, +_G, \circ_G}_R$ and $\struct {H, +_H, \circ_H}_R$ be $R$-modules.
Let $\phi: G \to H$ be a linear transformation.
Let $M$ be a submodule of $G$.
Then $\phi \sqbrk M$ is a submodule of $H$.
Proof
Let $N = \phi \sqbrk M$ be the image set of $M$ under $\phi$.
By definition, a linear transformation $\phi: G \to H$ is, in particular, a (group) homomorphism from the group $\struct {G, +_G}$ to the group $\struct {H, +_H}$.
We have by hypothesis that $M$ is a submodule of $G$.
So from Elements of Submodule form Subgroup, $M$ forms a subgroup of $G$.
From Group Homomorphism Preserves Subgroups, $N$ is therefore a subgroup of $H$.
$\Box$
It remains to be shown that $N$ is closed for scalar product:
- $\forall \lambda \in R, x \in N: \lambda \circ_H x \in N$
As $M$ is a submodule of $G$, $M$ itself is closed for scalar product:
- $\forall \lambda \in R, y \in N: \lambda \circ_G y \in M$
We have:
\(\ds \forall n \in N: \exists y \in M: \, \) | \(\ds x\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \phi y\) | Definition of $\phi$ | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \forall \lambda \in R: \, \) | \(\ds \lambda \circ_H x\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \lambda \circ_H \map \phi y\) | ||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \phi {\lambda \circ_G y}\) | Definition of Morphism Property applied to $\phi$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \lambda \circ_H x\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds \phi \sqbrk M\) | as $\lambda \circ_G y \in M$ | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \lambda \circ_H x\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds N\) | Definition of $N$ |
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {V}$: Vector Spaces: $\S 28$. Linear Transformations: Theorem $28.2$