Intersection Measure is Measure
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
Let $\struct {X, \Sigma, \mu}$ be a measure space.
Let $F \in \Sigma$ be a measurable set.
Then the intersection measure $\mu_F$ is a measure on the measurable space $\struct {X, \Sigma}$.
Proof
Verify the axioms for a measure in turn for $\mu_F$:
Axiom $(1)$
The statement of axiom $(1)$ for $\mu_F$ is:
- $\forall E \in \Sigma: \map {\mu_F} E \ge 0$
For every $E \in \Sigma$ have:
\(\ds \map {\mu_F} E\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \mu {E \cap F}\) | Definition of $\mu_F$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\ge\) | \(\ds 0\) | $\mu$ is a measure |
$\Box$
Axiom $(2)$
Let $\sequence {E_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a sequence of pairwise disjoint sets in $\Sigma$.
The statement of axiom $(2)$ for $\mu_F$ is:
- $\ds \map {\mu_F} {\bigcup_{n \mathop \in \N} E_n} = \sum_{n \mathop \in \N} \map {\mu_F} {E_n}$
This is verified by the following computation:
\(\ds \map {\mu_F} {\bigcup_{n \mathop \in \N} E_n}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \mu {\paren {\bigcup_{n \mathop \in \N} E_n} \cap F}\) | Definition of $\mu_F$ | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \mu {\bigcup_{n \mathop \in \N} \paren {E_n \cap F} }\) | Intersection Distributes over Union: General Result | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sum_{n \mathop \in \N} \map \mu {E_n \cap F}\) | $\mu$ is a measure | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \sum_{n \mathop \in \N} \map {\mu_F} {E_n}\) | Definition of $\mu_F$ |
$\Box$
Axiom $(3')$
The statement of axiom $(3')$ for $\mu_F$ is:
- $\map {\mu_F} \O = 0$
We have:
\(\ds \map {\mu_F} \O =\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \mu {\O \cap F}\) | Intersection with Empty Set | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds \map \mu {\O}\) | Intersection with Empty Set | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds 0\) | $\mu$ is a measure |
$\Box$
Having verified a suitable set of axioms, it follows that $\mu_F$ is a measure.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 2005: René L. Schilling: Measures, Integrals and Martingales ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 4$: Problem $7$