Ordering on Cuts satisfies Trichotomy Law

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

Let $\alpha$ and $\beta$ be cuts.

Then exactly one of the following applies:

\(\text {(1)}: \quad\) \(\ds \alpha\) \(<\) \(\ds \beta\)
\(\text {(2)}: \quad\) \(\ds \alpha\) \(=\) \(\ds \beta\)
\(\text {(3)}: \quad\) \(\ds \alpha\) \(>\) \(\ds \beta\)

where $<$ and so $>$ denote the strict ordering of cuts:

$\alpha < \beta \iff \exists p \in \Q: p \in \alpha, p \notin \beta$

Hence the ordering of cuts $\le$ is a total ordering.


Proof

Let $\alpha = \beta$.

By definition of equality of cuts:

$p \in \alpha \iff p \in \beta$

By definition of strict ordering of cuts it follows that neither $\alpha < \beta$ or $\alpha > \beta$.


Aiming for a contradiction, suppose both $\alpha < \beta$ and $\alpha > \beta$.

Because $\alpha < \beta$ there exists $p \in \Q$ such that:

$p \in \beta, p \notin \alpha$

Because $\alpha > \beta$ there exists $q \in \Q$ such that:

$q \in \alpha, q \notin \beta$

By Rational Number Not in Cut is Greater than Element of Cut:

$p \in \beta$ and $q \notin \beta$ implies $p < q$.
$q \in \alpha$ and $p \notin \alpha$ implies $p > q$.

But from Rational Numbers form Ordered Field, $p < q$ and $p > q$ is not possible.

Hence by Proof by Contradiction, it is not possible for both $\alpha < \beta$ and $\alpha > \beta$.


Suppose either $\alpha < \beta$ or $\alpha > \beta$.

Then by definition of strict ordering of cuts it follows that $\alpha \ne \beta$.


Thus mutual exclusivity of the three conditions has been demonstrated.

That is, at most one of the three conditions holds.

$\Box$


It remains to be shown that at least one of the three conditions holds.

Suppose $\alpha \ne \beta$.

Then by definition of equality of cuts, either:

$\exists p \in \alpha: p \notin \beta$

in which case $\alpha > \beta$, or:

$\exists q \in \beta: q \notin \alpha$

in which case $\alpha < \beta$.

Hence the result.

$\blacksquare$


Sources