Smallest Cunningham Chain of the First Kind of Length 7
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Theorem
The smallest Cunningham chain of the first kind of length $7$ is:
- $\left({1 \, 122 \, 659, 2 \, 245 \, 319, 4 \, 490 \, 639, 8 \, 981 \, 279, 17 \, 962 \, 559, 35 \, 925 \, 119, 71 \, 850 \, 239}\right)$
Proof
Let $C$ denote the sequence in question.
We have that:
- $\dfrac {1 \, 122 \, 659 - 1} 2 = 561 \, 329 = 83 \times 6763$
and so is not prime.
Thus $1 \, 122 \, 659$ is not a safe prime, as is required for $C$ to be a Cunningham chain of the first kind.
Then:
\(\ds 2 \times 561 \, 329 + 1\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 1 \, 122 \, 659\) | which is the $87 \, 359$th prime | |||||||||||
\(\ds 2 \times 1 \, 122 \, 659 + 1\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 2 \, 245 \, 319\) | which is the $165 \, 760$th prime | |||||||||||
\(\ds 2 \times 2 \, 245 \, 319 + 1\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 4 \, 490 \, 639\) | which is the $315 \, 347$th prime | |||||||||||
\(\ds 2 \times 4 \, 490 \, 639 + 1\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 8 \, 981 \, 279\) | which is the $601 \, 286$th prime | |||||||||||
\(\ds 2 \times 8 \, 981 \, 279 + 1\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 17 \, 962 \, 559\) | which is the $1 \, 149 \, 096$th prime | |||||||||||
\(\ds 2 \times 17 \, 962 \, 559 + 1\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 35 \, 925 \, 119\) | which is the $2 \, 199 \, 933$rd prime | |||||||||||
\(\ds 2 \times 35 \, 925 \, 119 + 1\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 71 \, 850 \, 239\) | which is the $4 \, 220 \, 407$th prime | |||||||||||
\(\ds 2 \times 71 \, 850 \, 239 + 1\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 143 \, 700 \, 479\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds 13 \times 47 \times 479 \times 491\) | and so is not prime |
Establishing that this is indeed the smallest such Cunningham chain of the first kind of length $7$ can be done by a computer search.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1986: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers ... (previous) ... (next): $1,122,659$
- 1994: Richard K. Guy: Unsolved Problems in Number Theory (2nd ed.)
- 1997: David Wells: Curious and Interesting Numbers (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1,122,659$