Stadium Paradox

Paradox

Consider three rows of bodies:

$\begin{array} {ccccc} \text {(A)} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \text {(B)} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \text {(C)} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array}$

Let row $\text {(A)}$ be at rest, while row $\text {(B)}$ and row $\text {(C)}$ are travelling at the same speed in opposite directions.

$\begin{array} {ccccccc} \text {(A)} & & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & \\ \text {(B)} & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & & \\ \text {(C)} & & & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array}$

By the time they are all in the same part of the course, $\text {(B)}$ will have passed twice as many of the bodies in $\text {(C)}$ as $\text {(A)}$ has.

Therefore the time it takes to pass $\text {(A)}$ is twice as long as it takes to pass $\text {(C)}$.

But the time which $\text {(B)}$ and $\text {(C)}$ take to reach the position of $\text {(A)}$ is the same.

Therefore double the time is equal to half the time.

Resolution

This article is incomplete. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by expanding it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Stub}} from the code. If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page.

Historical Note

The Stadium Paradox is one of Zeno's Paradoxes, as famously raised by Zeno of Elea.

Sources

• 1937: Eric Temple Bell: Men of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text{II}$: Modern Minds in Ancient Bodies
• 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein: Dictionary of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): Entry: Zeno's paradoxes
• 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Entry: stadium paradox
• 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Entry: Zeno of Elea (5th century bc)