Straight Line Commensurable with Apotome

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

In the words of Euclid:

A straight line commensurable in length with an apotome is an apotome and the same in order.

(The Elements: Book $\text{X}$: Proposition $103$)


Proof

Euclid-X-103.png

Let $AB$ be an apotome.

Let $CD$ be commensurable in length with $AB$.

It is to be demonstrated that:

$CD$ is an apotome

and:

the order of $CD$ is the same as the order of $AB$.


Let $BE$ be the annex of $CD$.

This can be constructed uniquely by Construction of Apotome is Unique.

By definition, $AE$ and $EB$ are rational straight lines which are commensurable in square only.

From Proposition $12$ of Book $\text{VI} $: Construction of Fourth Proportional Straight Line, let it be contrived that:

$BE : DF = AB : CD$

From Proposition $12$ of Book $\text{V} $: Sum of Components of Equal Ratios:

$AE : CF = AB : CD$

and so from Proposition $11$ of Book $\text{V} $: Equality of Ratios is Transitive:

$AE : CF = BE : DF$

But $AB$ is commensurable in length with $CD$.

Therefore from Proposition $11$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability of Elements of Proportional Magnitudes:

$AE$ is commensurable in length with $CF$

and:

$BE$ is commensurable in length with $DF$.

We have that $AE$ and $EB$ are rational straight lines which are commensurable in square only.

Therefore from Proposition $13$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurable Magnitudes are Incommensurable with Same Magnitude:

$CF$ and $FD$ are rational straight lines which are commensurable in square only.

Thus $CD$ is an apotome.

$\Box$


It remains to be shown that the order of $CD$ is the same as the order of $AB$.

We have that:

$AE : CF = BE : DF$

So from Proposition $16$ of Book $\text{V} $: Proportional Magnitudes are Proportional Alternately:

$AE : EB = CF : FD$

We have that:

$AE^2 = EB^2 + \lambda^2$

where either:

$\lambda$ is commensurable in length with $AE$

or:

$\lambda$ is incommensurable in length with $AE$.


Suppose $\lambda$ is commensurable in length with $AE$.

Then by Proposition $14$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability of Squares on Proportional Straight Lines:

$CF^2 > FD^2 + \mu^2$

where $\mu$ is commensurable in length with $CF$.

Let $AE$ be commensurable in length with a rational straight line $\alpha$ set out.

Then by Proposition $12$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability is Transitive Relation:

$CD$ is commensurable in length with $\alpha$.

Similarly, let $BE$ be commensurable in length with $\alpha$.

Then by Proposition $12$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability is Transitive Relation:

$DF$ is commensurable in length with $\alpha$.

Suppose neither $AE$ nor $BE$ is commensurable in length with $\alpha$.

Then by Proposition $13$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurable Magnitudes are Incommensurable with Same Magnitude:

neither $CF$ nor $FD$ will be commensurable in length with $\alpha$.


Let $\lambda$ be incommensurable in length with $AE$.

Then by Proposition $14$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability of Squares on Proportional Straight Lines:

$CF^2 > FD^2 + \mu^2$

where $\mu$ is incommensurable in length with $CF$.

Let $AE$ be commensurable in length with a rational straight line $\alpha$ set out.

Then by Proposition $12$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability is Transitive Relation:

$CD$ is commensurable in length with $\alpha$.

Similarly, let $BE$ be commensurable in length with $\alpha$.

Then by Proposition $12$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurability is Transitive Relation:

$DF$ is commensurable in length with $\alpha$.

Suppose neither $AE$ nor $BE$ is commensurable in length with $\alpha$.

Then by Proposition $13$ of Book $\text{X} $: Commensurable Magnitudes are Incommensurable with Same Magnitude:

neither $CF$ nor $FD$ will be commensurable in length with $\alpha$.

It follows that $CD$ is an apotome of the same as the order as $AB$.

$\blacksquare$


Historical Note

This proof is Proposition $103$ of Book $\text{X}$ of Euclid's The Elements.


Sources