Template talk:ProofWiki

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The template renders improperly on my Chrome install. Firefox is fine, though. --Lord_Farin (talk) 18:56, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

The template looks fine on my Chrome browser.--Anghel (talk) 19:33, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Also looks fine here (Version 24.0.1312.57 m) --GFauxPas (talk) 19:58, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
There is a negative space \! between the lemniscate and the $f$. My usage of local fonts means that the rendering is proper without those spacing adjustments. Probably there are some flaws in the stock MathJax web fonts that cause this issue. I'll live with it until a new token set for MathJax is implemented - if such ever happens. --Lord_Farin (talk) 20:35, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
If there's a problem then remove the \! - it's just a nicety. --prime mover (talk) 20:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
I fear the choice is between rendering correctly for me, or for at least the vast majority of the other visitors. I'll live. --Lord_Farin (talk) 21:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm not a fan of the font choice; I'd rather it look like the logo on the top left of the wiki. But I'll back down if other people like the current implementation. --GFauxPas (talk) 13:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

I still prefer $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ because the $\infty$ blends in really well. Consistency with the logo would bring $\mathrm{Pr} \infty \mathrm{fWiki}$ (eugh...) or even simply $Pr \infty fWiki$. --Lord_Farin (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
Being a template it's easy to change it at will ... Looking at the mathsf version, it concede that it does look neater. Feel free to change it. --prime mover (talk) 13:45, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
I also vote for the sans-serif one. --GFauxPas (talk) 13:46, 13 February 2013 (UTC)