Union of Indexed Family of Sets Equal to Union of Disjoint Sets
Theorem
Let $\family {E_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ be a countable indexed family of sets where at least two $E_n$ are distinct.
Then there exists a countable indexed family of disjoint sets $\family {F_n}_{n \mathop \in \N}$ defined by:
- $\ds F_k = E_k \setminus \paren {\bigcup_{j \mathop = 0}^{k \mathop - 1} E_j}$
satisfying:
- $\ds \bigsqcup_{n \mathop \in \N} F_n = \bigcup_{n \mathop \in \N} E_n$
where $\bigsqcup$ denotes disjoint union.
Corollary
The countable family $\family {F_k}_{k \mathop \in \N}$ can be constructed by:
- $\ds F_k = \bigcap_{j \mathop = 0}^{k \mathop - 1} \paren {E_k \setminus E_j}$
General Result
Let $I$ be a set which can be well-ordered by a well-ordering $\preccurlyeq$.
Let $\family {E_\alpha}_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ be a countable indexed family of sets indexed by $I$ where at least two $E_\alpha$ are distinct.
Then there exists a countable indexed family of disjoint sets $\family {F_\alpha}_{\alpha \mathop \in I}$ defined by:
- $\ds F_\beta = E_\beta \setminus \paren {\bigcup_{\alpha \mathop \prec \beta} E_\alpha}$
satisfying:
- $\ds \bigsqcup_{\alpha \mathop \in I} F_n = \bigcup_{\alpha \mathop \in I} E_n$
where:
- $\bigsqcup$ denotes disjoint union.
- $\alpha \prec \beta$ denotes that $\alpha \preccurlyeq \beta$ and $\alpha \ne \beta$.
Proof
Denote:
\(\ds E\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \bigcup_{k \mathop \in \N} E_k\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds F\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \bigcup_{k \mathop \in \N} F_k\) |
where:
- $\ds F_k = E_k \setminus \paren {\bigcup_{j \mathop = 0}^{k \mathop - 1} E_j}$
We first show that $E = F$.
That $x \in E \implies x \in F$ follows from the construction of $F$ from subsets of $E$.
Thus $E \subseteq F$.
Then:
\(\ds x\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds \bigcup_{k \mathop \in \N} F_k\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \exists k \in \N: \, \) | \(\ds x\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds F_k\) | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \exists k \in \N: \, \) | \(\ds x\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds E_k\) | ||||||||||
\(\, \ds \land \, \) | \(\ds x\) | \(\notin\) | \(\ds \paren {E_0 \cup E_1 \cup E_2 \cup \cdots \cup E_{k - 1} }\) | |||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \exists k \in \N: \, \) | \(\ds x\) | \(\in\) | \(\ds E_k\) | Rule of Simplification |
so $F \subseteq E$.
Thus $E = F$ by definition of set equality.
To show that the sets in $F$ are (pairwise) disjoint, consider an arbitrary $x \in F$.
Then $x \in F_k$ for some $F_k$.
By the Well-Ordering Principle, there exists a smallest such $k$.
Then:
- $\forall j < k: x \notin F_j$
Choose any distinct $\ell, m \in \N$.
We have:
If $m > \ell$, then:
\(\ds x \in F_\ell\) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds x \in E_\ell\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds x \in F_m\) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds x \notin E_m\) |
If $m < \ell$, then:
\(\ds x \in F_m\) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds x \in E_m\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds x \in F_\ell\) | \(\implies\) | \(\ds x \notin E_\ell\) |
So the sets $F_\ell, F_m$ are disjoint.
Thus $F$ is the disjoint union of sets equal to $E$:
- $\ds \bigcup_{k \mathop \in \N} E_k = \bigsqcup_{k \mathop \in \N} F_k$
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1996: Winfried Just and Martin Weese: Discovering Modern Set Theory. I: The Basics ... (previous) ... (next): Part $1$: Not Entirely Naive Set Theory: Chapter $2$: Partial Order Relations: Exercise $12$