Characterization of Compact Element in Complete Lattice/Statement 2 implies Statement 1
![]() | This article needs proofreading. Please check it for mathematical errors. If you believe there are none, please remove {{Proofread}} from the code.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Proofread}} from the code. |
Theorem
Let $L = \struct{S, \preceq}$ be a complete lattice.
Let $a \in S$ satisfy:
- $\forall I \subseteq S : I$ is an ideal $: a \preceq \sup I \implies a \in I$
Then:
- $a$ is a compact element
Proof
Let $D$ be a directed subset of $S$:
- $a \preceq \sup D$
Let $I = {b \in S : \exists d \in D : b \preceq d}$.
$I$ is an Ideal of $S$
We will show that $I$ satisfies the join semilattice ideal axioms.
$I$ is a Lower Section
Let $x \in I$.
Let $y \preceq x$.
By definition of $I$:
- $\exists d \in D : x \preceq d$
By Ordering Axiom $(2)$: Transitivity:
- $y \preceq d$
Hence:
- $y \in I$
It follows that $I$ is a lower section of $S$.
$\Box$
$I$ is a Join Subsemilattice
Let $x, y \in I$.
By definition of $I$:
- $\exists d_1, d_2 \in D : x \preceq d, y \preceq e$
By definition of a directed subset:
- $\exists d \in D : d_1, d_2 \preceq d$
By Ordering Axiom $(2)$: Transitivity:
- $x, y \preceq d$
By definition of join:
- $x \vee y \preceq d$
Hence:
- $x \vee y \in I$
$\Box$
This proves $I$ satisfies the join semilattice ideal axioms.
It follows that $I$ is an ideal by definition.
$\Box$
Supremum of $I$ Equals Supremum of $D$
We show that $\sup I = \sup D$.
Let $x \in I$.
By definition of $I$:
- $\exists d \in D: x \preceq d$
By definition of supremum:
- $x \preceq \sup D$
Since $x$ was arbitrary, it follows that:
- $\sup D$ is an upper bound for $I$
By definition of supremum:
- $\sup I \preceq \sup D$
Note that for all $d \in D$:
- $d \in I$
Hence:
- $\sup I$ is an upper bound for $D$
By definition of supremum:
- $\sup D \preceq \sup I$
From Ordering Axiom $(3)$: Antisymmetry:
- $\sup I = \sup D$
$\Box$
We have by hypothesis:
- $a \in I$
By definition of $I$:
- $\exists d \in D : a \preceq d$
Since $D$ was arbitrary:
- for every directed subset $D$ of $S$ such that $a \preceq \sup D$
- $\exists d \in D: a \preceq d$
Hence $a$ is a compact element by definition.
$\blacksquare$