Condition on Congruence Relations for Cancellable Monoid to be Group/Counterexample

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Theorem

Let $\struct {S, \circ}$ be a monoid which is not cancellable.

Let every non-trivial congruence relation on $\struct {S, \circ}$ be induced by a normal subgroup of $\struct {S, \circ}$.


Then it is not necessarily the case that $\struct {S, \circ}$ is a group.


Proof


Although this article appears correct, it's inelegant. There has to be a better way of doing it.
In particular: Is all this necessary, considering we have Group is Cancellable Monoid?
You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by redesigning it.
To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Improve}} from the code.
If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to {{Proofread}} the page.


Consider the Multiplicative Monoid of Integers Modulo $3$ $\struct {\Z_3, \times_3}$, defined by its Cayley table:

$\begin{array} {r|rrr}

\struct {\Z_3, \times_3} & \eqclass 0 3 & \eqclass 1 3 & \eqclass 2 3 & \\ \hline \eqclass 0 3 & \eqclass 0 3 & \eqclass 0 3 & \eqclass 0 3 \\ \eqclass 1 3 & \eqclass 0 3 & \eqclass 1 3 & \eqclass 2 3 \\ \eqclass 2 3 & \eqclass 0 3 & \eqclass 2 3 & \eqclass 1 3 \\ \end{array}$

which can also be presented:

$\begin{array} {r|rrrrr}

\times_3 & 0 & 1 & 2 \\ \hline 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 1 & 2 \\ 2 & 0 & 2 & 1 \end{array}$


It is noted that $\struct {\Z_3, \times_3}$ is not a cancellable monoid.

Indeed:

$0 \times_3 1 = 0$
$0 \times_3 2 = 0$

and so $\times_3$ is not cancellable for $0$.

Hence from Group is Cancellable Monoid:

$\struct {\Z_3, \times_3}$ is not a group.


We note that $\struct {\Z_3, \times_3}$ has an identity element $\eqclass 1 3$.


We list all the equivalence relations on $\struct {\Z_3, \times_3}$ by the partitions they induce:

$\set {\set 0, \set 1, \set 2}$ is induced by the diagonal relation
$\set {\set {0, 1, 2}}$ is induced by the trivial relation
$\set {\set {0, 1}, \set 2}$ is not a congruence relation because we have $0 \mathrel \RR 1$ and $2 \mathrel \RR 2$ but not $\paren {0 \times 2} \mathrel \RR \paren {1 \times 2}$
$\set {\set {0, 2}, \set 1}$ is not a congruence relation because we have $0 \mathrel \RR 2$ and $2 \mathrel \RR 2$ but not $\paren {0 \times 2} \mathrel \RR \paren {2 \times 2}$
$\set {\set 0, \set {1, 2}}$ is induced by the equivalence relation induced by the normal subgroup $\set 0$.


This article, or a section of it, needs explaining.
In particular: Can a normal subgroup induce an equivalence relation when $S$ is not cancellable, since all cosets of $\set 0$ is $\set 0$?
You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it.
To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.
When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code.


We see that the first four relations are not non-trivial congruence relation on $\struct {S, \circ}$.

Therefore every non-trivial congruence relation on $\struct {S, \circ}$ is induced by a normal subgroup of $\struct {S, \circ}$.


But, a priori, $\struct {\Z_3, \times_3}$ is not a group.

$\blacksquare$


Sources

Retrieved from "https://proofwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Condition_on_Congruence_Relations_for_Cancellable_Monoid_to_be_Group/Counterexample&oldid=584773"