# Definition:Ordering on Natural Numbers

## Contents

## Informal Definition

Let $\N$ denote the natural numbers.

The ordering on $\N$ is the relation $\le$ everyone is familiar with.

For example, we use it when we say:

- James has $6$ apples, which is more than Mary, who has $4$.

which can be symbolised as:

- $6 \ge 4$

Every attempt to describe the natural numbers via suitable axioms should reproduce the intuitive behaviour of $\le$.

The same holds for any construction of $\N$ in an ambient theory.

## Definition

### Ordering on Peano Structure

Let $\left({P, 0, s}\right)$ be a Peano structure.

The **ordering** of $P$ is the relation $\le$ defined by:

- $\forall m, n \in P: m \le n \iff \exists p \in P: m + p = n$

where $+$ denotes addition in $\left({P, 0, s}\right)$.

### Ordering on Naturally Ordered Semigroup

Let $\left({S, \circ, \preceq}\right)$ be a naturally ordered semigroup.

The relation $\preceq$ in $\left({S, \circ, \preceq}\right)$ is called the **ordering**.

### Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers

Let $\N_{>0}$ be the axiomatised $1$-based natural numbers.

The **strict ordering of $\N_{>0}$**, denoted $<$, is defined as follows:

- $\forall a, b \in \N_{>0}: a < b \iff \exists c \in \N_{>0}: a + c = b$

The **(weak) ordering of $\N_{>0}$**, denoted $\le$, is defined as:

- $\forall a,b \in \N_{>0}: a \le b \iff a = b \lor a < b$

### Ordering on Minimal Infinite Successor Set

Let $\omega$ be the minimal infinite successor set.

The **strict ordering** of $\omega$ is the relation $<$ defined by:

- $\forall m,n \in \omega: m < n \iff m \in n$

The **(weak) ordering** of $\omega$ is the relation $\le$ defined by:

- $\forall m,n \in \omega: m \le n \iff m < n \lor m = n$

### Ordering on Natural Numbers in Real Numbers

Let $\left({\R, +, \times, \leq}\right)$ be the field of real numbers.

Let $\N$ be the natural numbers in $\R$.

Then the **ordering** of $\N$ is the restriction of $\le$ to $\N$.

## Also defined as

As seen above, not all sources define both the strict ordering $<$ and the weak ordering $\le$ on $\N$.

However, by Reflexive Reduction of Ordering is Strict Ordering and Reflexive Closure of Strict Ordering is Ordering, this is seen to be immaterial.