# Difference of Images under Mapping not necessarily equal to Image of Difference

Jump to navigation
Jump to search

## Theorem

Let $f: S \to T$ be a mapping.

The image of the set difference of two subsets of $S$ is not necessarily equal to the set difference of the images.

That is:

Let $S_1$ and $S_2$ be subsets of $S$.

Then it is not always the case that:

- $f \sqbrk {S_1} \setminus f \sqbrk {S_2} = f \sqbrk {S_1 \setminus S_2}$

where $\setminus$ denotes set difference.

## Proof

Note that from Image of Set Difference under Mapping:

- $f \sqbrk {S_1} \setminus f \sqbrk {S_2} \subseteq f \sqbrk {S_1 \setminus S_2}$

By Proof by Counterexample it is demonstrated that the inclusion does not necessarily apply in the other direction.

Let:

- $S_1 = \set {x \in \Z: x \le 0}$
- $S_2 = \set {x \in \Z: x \ge 0}$
- $f: \Z \to \Z: \forall x \in \Z: \map f x = x^2$

We have:

- $S_1 \setminus S_2 = \set {-1, -2, -3, \ldots}$
- $f \sqbrk {S_1} = \set {0, 1, 4, 9, 16, \ldots} = f \sqbrk {S_2}$

Then from Set Difference with Self is Empty Set:

- $f \sqbrk {S_1} \setminus f \sqbrk {S_2} = \O$

but:

- $f \sqbrk {S_1 \setminus S_2} = f \sqbrk {\set {x \in \Z: x > 0} } = \set {1, 4, 9, 16, \ldots}$

## Sources

- 1971: Allan Clark:
*Elements of Abstract Algebra*... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Mappings: $\S 12 \alpha$ - 1975: T.S. Blyth:
*Set Theory and Abstract Algebra*... (previous) ... (next): $\S 5$. Induced mappings; composition; injections; surjections; bijections: Exercise $1$ - 1996: Winfried Just and Martin Weese:
*Discovering Modern Set Theory. I: The Basics*... (previous) ... (next): Part $1$: Not Entirely Naive Set Theory: Chapter $1$: Pairs, Relations, and Functions: Exercise $7 \ \text {(c)}$ - 2005: René L. Schilling:
*Measures, Integrals and Martingales*... (previous) ... (next): $\S 2$ - 2005: René L. Schilling:
*Measures, Integrals and Martingales*... (previous) ... (next): $\S 2$: Problem $4 \ \text{(i)}$

This page may be the result of a refactoring operation.As such, the following source works, along with any process flow, will need to be reviewed. When this has been completed, the citation of that source work (if it is appropriate that it stay on this page) is to be placed above this message, into the usual chronological ordering.In particular: Check whether the below sources include this resultIf you have access to any of these works, then you are invited to review this list, and make any necessary corrections.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of `{{SourceReview}}` from the code. |

- 2000: James R. Munkres:
*Topology*(2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1$: Set Theory and Logic: $\S 2$: Functions: Exercise $2.2 \ \text{(h)}$