Equivalence of Definitions of Order of Group Element
Theorem
The following definitions of the concept of Order of Group Element are equivalent:
Let $G$ be a group whose identity is $e$.
Let $x \in G$.
Definition 1
The order of $x$ (in $G$), denoted $\order x$, is the smallest $k \in \Z_{> 0}$ such that $x^k = e_G$.
Definition 2
The order of $x$ (in $G$), denoted $\order x$, is the order of the group generated by $x$:
- $\order x := \order {\gen x}$
Definition 3
The order of $x$ (in $G$), denoted $\order x$, is the largest $k \in \Z_{>0}$ such that:
- $\forall i, j \in \Z: 0 \le i < j < k \implies x^i \ne x^j$
Proof
Let $k$ be the order of $x$ in $G$ according to Definition 1.
Let $l$ be the order of $x$ in $G$ according to Definition 3.
Definition $1$ is equivalent to Definition $3$
Aiming for a contradiction, suppose $k \ne l$.
Then from Ordering on 1-Based Natural Numbers is Trichotomy either $k < l$ or $k > l$.
According to Definition 3:
- $\forall i, j \in \Z: 0 \le i < j < l \implies x^i \ne x^j$
If $k < l$, then letting $i = 0$ and $j = k$ yields a contradiction by Element to Power of Zero is Identity.
If $k > l$, then:
- $\exists i,j \in \Z: 0 \le i < j < k: x^i = x^j$
But then $x^{j - i} = e$ and $j - i < k$, contradicting the fact that $k \in \Z_{> 0}$ is the smallest such that $x^k = e$.
Therefore $k = l$.
$\Box$
Definition $1$ is equivalent to Definition $2$
It follows straight away from List of Elements in Finite Cyclic Group that $\order {\gen a} = k$:
- $\gen a = \set {a^0, a^1, a^2, \ldots, a^{k - 1} }$
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1971: Allan Clark: Elements of Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $2$: Subgroups and Cosets: $\S 41$
- 1966: Richard A. Dean: Elements of Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.9$: Subgroups: Example $28$
- 1978: Thomas A. Whitelaw: An Introduction to Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 38.4$ Period of an element: $\text{(iv)}$