Ordinal is not Element of Itself/Proof 3
Theorem
Let $x$ be an ordinal.
Then:
- $x \notin x$
Proof
Let $\On$ denote the class of all ordinals.
From Class of All Ordinals is Minimally Superinductive over Successor Mapping, $\On$ is superinductive.
Hence we can use the Principle of Superinduction.
By Zero is Smallest Ordinal, $0$ is the smallest element of $\On$.
We identify the natural number $0$ via the von Neumann construction of the natural numbers as:
- $0 := \O$
From Empty Set is Ordinary:
- $\O \notin \O$
and so:
- $0 \notin 0$
$\Box$
Let $x$ be an ordinal for which it has been established that:
- $x \notin x$
Then by Successor Set of Ordinary Transitive Set is Ordinary:
- $x^+ \notin x^+$
$\Box$
It remains to be shown that if $C$ is a chain of ordinals all of which are ordinary, then $\bigcup C$ is ordinary.
Let $C$ be a chain of ordinals.
From Union of Set of Ordinals is Ordinal, $\bigcup C$ is itself an ordinal.
Let $\alpha = \bigcup C$.
Aiming for a contradiction, suppose $\bigcup C$ is not ordinary.
That is, suppose that $\alpha \in \alpha$.
Then:
- $\alpha \in \bigcup C$
Hence for some $\beta \in C$:
- $\alpha \in \beta$
But:
- $\beta \in C$
and so:
- $\beta \subseteq \bigcup C$
That is:
- $\beta \subseteq \alpha$
Because $\alpha \in \beta$ and Ordinal is Transitive:
- $\alpha \subseteq \beta$
Hence by definition of set equality:
- $\alpha = \beta$
That is:
- $\beta \in \beta$
Thus some element of $C$, that is, $\beta$, is an element of itself.
That is, not all elements of $C$ are ordinary.
This contradicts our assertion that all elements of $C$ are ordinary.
Hence by Proof by Contradiction we have that if $C$ is a chain of ordinals all of which are ordinary, then $\bigcup C$ is ordinary:
- $\bigcup C \notin \bigcup C$
$\Box$
The result then follows by the Principle of Superinduction.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 2010: Raymond M. Smullyan and Melvin Fitting: Set Theory and the Continuum Problem (revised ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $5$: Ordinal Numbers: $\S 1$ Ordinal numbers: Theorem $1.8$