# Definition:Zero (Number)

This page has been identified as a candidate for refactoring of advanced complexity.In particular: Establish the relationship between this definition and that for the number fields as introduced below.Until this has been finished, please leave
`{{Refactor}}` in the code.
Because of the underlying complexity of the work needed, it is recommended that you do not embark on a refactoring task until you have become familiar with the structural nature of pages of $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of `{{Refactor}}` from the code. |

## Definition

The number **zero** is defined as being the cardinal of the empty set.

### Naturally Ordered Semigroup

Let $\struct {S, \circ, \preceq}$ be a naturally ordered semigroup.

Then from Naturally Ordered Semigroup Axiom $\text {NO} 1$: Well-Ordered, $\struct {S, \circ, \preceq}$ has a smallest element.

This smallest element of $\struct {S, \circ, \preceq}$ is called **zero** and has the symbol $0$.

That is:

- $\forall n \in S: 0 \preceq n$

### Natural Numbers

### Integers

### Rational Numbers

### Real Numbers

### Complex Numbers

Let $\C$ denote the set of complex numbers.

The **zero** of $\C$ is the complex number:

- $0 + 0 i$

This article is incomplete.In particular: Define this in the context of the standard number fields.You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by expanding it.To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page.When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of `{{Stub}}` from the code.If you would welcome a second opinion as to whether your work is correct, add a call to `{{Proofread}}` the page. |

## Also known as

The somewhat outdated term **cipher** or **cypher** can on occasion be seen for the number **zero**, especially when used in the context of a **zero digit** in a basis representation.

The words **nought** or **naught** can also be seen.

Younger children often use the word **nothing**.

## Also see

## Historical Note

The Babylonians from the $2$nd century BCE used a number base system of arithmetic, with a placeholder to indicate that a particular place within a number was empty, but its use was inconsistent. However, they had no actual recognition of zero as a mathematical concept in its own right.

The Ancient Greeks had no conception of zero as a number.

The concept of zero was invented by the mathematicians of India. The *Bakhshali Manuscript* from the $3$rd century CE contains the first reference to it.

However, even then there were reservations about its existence, and misunderstanding about how it behaved.

In *Ganita Sara Samgraha* of Mahaviracharya, c. $850$ CE appears:

*A number multiplied by zero is zero and that number remains unchanged which is divided by, added to or diminished by zero.*

It was not until the propagation of Arabic numbers, where its use as a placeholder made it important, that it became commonplace.

## Linguistic Note

The Sanskrit word used by the early Indian mathematicians for zero was **sunya**, which means **empty**, or **blank**.

In Arabic this was translated as **sifr**.

This was translated via the Latin **zephirum** into various European languages as **zero**, **cifre**, **cifra**, and into English as **zero** and **cipher**.

## Sources

- 1960: Walter Ledermann:
*Complex Numbers*... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.1$. Number Systems - 1974: Murray R. Spiegel:
*Theory and Problems of Advanced Calculus*(SI ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Numbers: Real Numbers: $2$ - 1975: T.S. Blyth:
*Set Theory and Abstract Algebra*: $\S 8$ - 1981: Murray R. Spiegel:
*Theory and Problems of Complex Variables*(SI ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Complex Numbers: The Real Number System: $2$ - 1986: David Wells:
*Curious and Interesting Numbers*... (previous) ... (next): $-1$ and $i$ - 1997: David Wells:
*Curious and Interesting Numbers*(2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $-1$ and $i$ - 1998: David Nelson:
*The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics*(2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Entry:**zero**:**1.** - 2008: David Nelson:
*The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics*(4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Entry:**zero**:**1.** - 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson:
*The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics*(5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Entry:**zero**