Subset is Right Compatible with Ordinal Exponentiation
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
![]() | This article needs to be linked to other articles. In particular: link 'right compatible', 'induction hypothesis' You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by adding these links. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{MissingLinks}} from the code. |
Theorem
Let $x, y, z$ be ordinals.
Then:
- $x \le y \implies x^z \le y^z$
Proof
The proof shall proceed by Transfinite Induction on $z$.
Basis for the Induction
If $z = \O$, then $x^z = 1$
\(\ds x^z\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 1\) | Definition of Ordinal Exponentiation | |||||||||||
\(\ds y^z\) | \(=\) | \(\ds 1\) | Definition of Ordinal Exponentiation | |||||||||||
\(\ds x^z\) | \(\le\) | \(\ds y^z\) | Set is Subset of Itself |
This proves the basis for the induction.
$\Box$
Induction Step
The inductive hypothesis states that $x^z \le y^z$ for $y$.
Then:
\(\ds x^{z^+}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds x^z \times x\) | Definition of Ordinal Exponentiation | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\le\) | \(\ds x^z \times y\) | Membership is Left Compatible with Ordinal Multiplication | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(\le\) | \(\ds y^z \times y\) | Subset is Right Compatible with Ordinal Multiplication | |||||||||||
\(\ds \) | \(=\) | \(\ds y^{z^+}\) | Definition of Ordinal Exponentiation |
This proves the induction step.
$\Box$
Limit Case
The inductive hypothesis for the limit case states that:
- $\forall w \in z: x^w \le y^w$ where $z$ is a limit ordinal.
\(\ds \forall w \in z: \, \) | \(\ds x^w\) | \(\subseteq\) | \(\ds y^w\) | Inductive Hypothesis | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds \bigcup_{w \mathop \in z} x^w\) | \(\subseteq\) | \(\ds \bigcup_{w \mathop \in z} y^w\) | Indexed Union Subset | ||||||||||
\(\ds \leadsto \ \ \) | \(\ds x^z\) | \(\subseteq\) | \(\ds y^z\) | Definition of Ordinal Exponentiation |
This proves the limit case.
$\blacksquare$
Sources
- 1971: Gaisi Takeuti and Wilson M. Zaring: Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory: $\S 8.35$