Talk:Euclid's Lemma

Any particular reason proofwiki's Euclid's Lemma is different from Wikipedia's?

Yes, because it wasn't copied from Wikipedia. Its wording, as is, matches the sources presented. We (deliberately) make no particular effort to ensure we match Wikipedia. --prime mover (talk) 07:29, 31 December 2018 (EST)

One possible concern is the converse to Euclid's Lemma for primes is true but converse to generalised Euclid's Lemma is false...

This would indeed have been a concern if this page had included the converse. But as it doesn't, it's not. --prime mover (talk) 07:29, 31 December 2018 (EST)