Talk:Reflexive Closure is Closure Operator/Proof 2

Transclusion not needed here. Just provide links to the subpages and that's all you need to do. Thus the pages are kept as atomic as possible. Hence the philosophy as espoused in Code Complete whereby intermodule communication is kept as simple as possible (5.4: "Loose coupling") is upheld. --prime mover (talk) 08:58, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Atomicity vs Readability. I will always create pages in the way that I feel is most readable to me as a user of the site. You may do as you see fit PM. --Jshflynn (talk) 09:17, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

It's a debate which may need to continue.

I can see where you are coming from here, and I may be persuaded. Trouble is, a letter-of-the-law interpretation of our house style rules will insist on the renaming of the subpages to be Reflexive Closure is Closure Operator/Proof 2/blabla ... which may cause various assorted stuffed animals to come flying at light-speed from perambulation carriages throughout the length and breadth of the universe (mine, for a start).

Okay, leave well alone - the technique seems to work well here. The more general issue of subpage names can be fought on a larger battleground. --prime mover (talk) 09:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)