Triangle Inequality for Generalized Sums
![]() | This article needs to be linked to other articles. You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by adding these links. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{MissingLinks}} from the code. |
Theorem
Let $V$ be a Banach space.
Let $\norm {\,\cdot\,}$ denote the norm on $V$.
Let $\family {v_i}_{i \mathop \in I}$ be an indexed subset of $V$.
Let the generalized sum $\ds \sum \set {v_i: i \in I}$ converge absolutely.
Then:
- $(1): \quad \ds \norm {\sum \set {v_i: i \in I} } \le \sum \set {\norm {v_i}: i \in I}$
Proof
First of all, note that Absolutely Convergent Generalized Sum Converges assures us that the left hand side in $(1)$ is defined.
Aiming for a contradiction, suppose there exists an $\epsilon > 0$ such that:
- $\ds \norm {\sum \set {v_i: i \in I} } > \sum \set {\norm {v_i}: i \in I} + \epsilon$
This supposition is seen to be equivalent to:
- $\ds \norm {\sum \set {v_i: i \in I} } > \sum \set {\norm {v_i}: i \in I}$
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: Expand below sentence to be more clear You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Then, by definition of a generalized sum, there necessarily exists a finite subset $F$ of $I$ with:
- $\ds \norm {\sum_{i \mathop \in F} v_i} > \norm {\sum \set {v_i: i \in I} } - \epsilon > \sum \set {\norm {v_i}: i \in I}$
However, using the standard triangle equality on this finite sum (that is, Norm Axiom $\text N 3$: Triangle Inequality, repetitively), we also have:
- $\ds \norm {\sum_{i \mathop \in F} v_i} \le \sum_{i \mathop \in F} \norm {v_i} \le \sum \set {\norm {v_i}: i \in I}$
Here the second inequality follows from Generalized Sum is Monotone.
These two estimates constitute a contradiction, and therefore such an $\epsilon$ cannot exist.
Hence:
- $\ds \norm {\sum \set {v_i: i \in I} } \le \sum \set {\norm {v_i}: i \in I}$
$\blacksquare$