User talk:Ivar Sand

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome to ProofWiki! Since you're new, you may want to check out the general help page. It's the best first stop to see how things are done (next to reading proofs, of course!). Please feel free to contribute to whichever area of mathematics interests you, either by adding new proofs, or fixing up existing ones. If you have any questions please feel free to contact one of the administrators, or post your question on the questions page.

Here are some useful pages to help get you started:

  • Community Portal - To see what needs to be done, and keep up to date with the community.
  • Recent Changes - To keep up with what's new, and what's being added.
  • Check out our house style if you are keen on contributing.
  • Main Page talk - This is where most of the main discussions regarding the direction of the site take place. If you have any ideas, please share them!

Cheers! Joe (talk) 10:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Heads up

I just wanted to compliment you for how quickly you've adopted house style, and for your constructive attitude. Glad to have you on board; we hope that you'll stick around! :) — Lord_Farin (talk) 14:28, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Please note -- take care with the Sources section

I direct you towards:

Help:FAQ/Questions about contributions/Why do you make such a fuss over the links in the "Sources" section?

Note that Mendelson does not include this result in 1962: Bert Mendelson: Introduction to Topology, so I have removed that inaccurate citation from the Sources section of the new page Supremum of Subset of Real Numbers is Arbitrarily Close that you posted. --prime mover (talk) 09:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Definition:Neighborhood (Real Analysis)

I see you changed Definition:Neighborhood (Real Analysis) to include two definitions of neighbourhood. That's all good and well. However, I see you didn't take the time to address the links (see Special:WhatLinksHere/Definition:Neighborhood (Real Analysis). Please make sure that each of them points to the correct instance. — Lord_Farin (talk) 12:00, 16 August 2016 (EDT)

Thanks. I'll have a look at it tomorrow. --Ivar Sand (talk) 12:04, 16 August 2016 (EDT)
This is one reason why we are reluctant to encourage non-admins to refactor existing pages. --prime mover (talk) 14:36, 16 August 2016 (EDT)
but having said that: good job. --prime mover (talk) 07:30, 17 August 2016 (EDT)
Thanks. I spent some time thinking about including a rename template on the page instead. But I was afraid that it might take time, like a day or more, to get the move done. I needed it to be done quickly, so I decided to take a chance and do it myself.
By the way, the links should be updated now.--Ivar Sand (talk) 08:32, 17 August 2016 (EDT)
No worries, you know what you're doing. Not a problem. --prime mover (talk) 13:50, 17 August 2016 (EDT)