Axiom of Choice implies Zorn's Lemma/Proof 2

From ProofWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Let the Axiom of Choice be accepted.

Then Zorn's Lemma holds.


Aiming for a contradiction, suppose that for each $x \in X$ there is a $y \in X$ such that $x \prec y$.

By the Axiom of Choice, there is a mapping $f: X \to X$ such that:

$\forall x \in X: x \prec \map f x$

Let $\CC$ be the set of all chains in $X$.

By the premise, each element of $\CC$ has an upper bound in $X$.

Thus by the Axiom of Choice, there is a mapping $g: \CC \to X$ such that for each $C \in \CC$, $\map g C$ is an upper bound of $C$.

Let $p$ be an arbitrary element of $X$.

Define a mapping $h: \On \to X$ by transfinite recursion thus:

\(\ds \map h 0\) \(=\) \(\ds p\)
\(\ds \map h {\alpha^+}\) \(=\) \(\ds \map f {\map h \alpha}\)
\(\ds \map h \lambda\) \(=\) \(\ds \map f {\map g {h \sqbrk \lambda} }\) if $\lambda$ is a limit ordinal

when $h \sqbrk \lambda$ is the image set of $\lambda$ under $h$.

Then $h$ is strictly increasing, and thus injective.

Let $h'$ be the restriction of $h$ to $\On \times \map h \On$.

Then ${h'}^{-1}$ is a surjection from $\map h \On \subseteq X$ onto $\On$.

By the Axiom of Replacement, $\On$ is a set.

By the Burali-Forti Paradox, this is a contradiction.

Thus we conclude that some element of $X$ has no strict successor, and is thus maximal.