Definition:Proper Subset
Definition
Let $S$ and $T$ be sets such that $S$ is a subset of $T$.
Let $S \ne T$.
Then $S$ is referred to as a proper subset of $T$, and we write:
- $S \subsetneq T$
or:
- $S \subsetneqq T$
Proper Superset
If $S$ is a proper subset of $T$, then $T$ is a proper superset of $S$.
This can be expressed by the notation $T \supsetneqq S$.
Notation
Notation in the literature for the concept of a subset can be confusing.
On $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$, the convention is as follows:
- $\subseteq$ is used for the general subset
- $\subsetneq$ or $\subsetneqq$ is used for the concept of a proper subset.
The notation $\subset$ is deprecated on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$, on the grounds that it can mean either.
Examples
Arbitrary Example
Let $A = \set {1, 2, 3}$.
Let $B = \set {1, 2, 3, 4}$.
Let $C = \set {1, 2, 3}$.
We see by inspection that $A$ is a proper subset of $B$.
However, while $A$ is a subset of $C$, it is not the case that $A$ is a proper subset of $C$.
Also defined as
Some authors require that $S \ne \O$ for $S$ to be a proper subset of $T$.
Hence, under this convention, $S$ is a proper subset of $T$ if and only if
- $\O \subsetneqq S \subsetneqq T$
It is wise to be aware of which definition is in use.
Also denoted as
The symbology used by some authors to denote a proper subset is:
- $A \subset B$
to mean:
- $A$ is a proper subset of $B$.
While this practice is common, it is not recommended on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ because it is also used by many other authors to mean subset which may or may not be proper.
Improper Subset
The term improper subset is relevant in treatments of set theory which define a proper subset $T$ as a subset $S$ of $T$ such that:
- $0 \subsetneqq S \subsetneqq T$
Under such a regime, $S$ is an improper subset of $T$ if and only if either:
- $S = T$
or:
- $S = \O$
Also known as
$S \subsetneqq T$ can also be read as:
- $S$ is properly included in $T$, or $T$ properly includes $S$
- $S$ is strictly included in $T$, or $T$ strictly includes $S$
The following usage can also be seen for $S \subsetneqq T$:
- $S$ is properly contained in $T$, or $T$ properly contains $S$
- $S$ is strictly contained in $T$, or $T$ strictly contains $S$
However, beware of the usage of contains: $S$ contains $T$ can also be interpreted as $S$ is an element of $T$.
Hence the use of contains is not supported on $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$.
Also see
- Results about proper subsets can be found here.
Sources
- 1951: Nathan Jacobson: Lectures in Abstract Algebra: Volume $\text { I }$: Basic Concepts ... (previous) ... (next): Introduction $\S 1$: Operations on Sets
- 1955: John L. Kelley: General Topology ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $0$: Subsets and Complements; Union and Intersection
- 1960: Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: The Axiom of Extension
- 1961: John G. Hocking and Gail S. Young: Topology ... (previous) ... (next): A Note on Set-Theoretic Concepts
- 1963: George F. Simmons: Introduction to Topology and Modern Analysis ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: Sets and Set Inclusion
- 1964: Steven A. Gaal: Point Set Topology ... (previous) ... (next): Introduction to Set Theory: $1$. Elementary Operations on Sets
- 1964: W.E. Deskins: Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.1$: Definition $1.1$
- 1964: William K. Smith: Limits and Continuity ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 2.1$: Sets
- 1965: A.M. Arthurs: Probability Theory ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Set Theory: $1.2$: Sets and subsets
- 1965: J.A. Green: Sets and Groups ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.2$. Subsets
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {III}$: The Natural Numbers: $\S 17$: Finite Sets
- 1966: Richard A. Dean: Elements of Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 0.2$. Sets
- 1967: George McCarty: Topology: An Introduction with Application to Topological Groups ... (previous) ... (next): Introduction: Set-Theoretic Notation
- 1968: A.N. Kolmogorov and S.V. Fomin: Introductory Real Analysis ... (previous) ... (next): $1$ Set Theory: $1$. Sets and Functions: $1.1$: Basic definitions
- 1968: Ian D. Macdonald: The Theory of Groups ... (previous) ... (next): Appendix: Elementary set and number theory
- 1971: Allan Clark: Elements of Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: The Notation and Terminology of Set Theory: $\S 3$
- 1971: Robert H. Kasriel: Undergraduate Topology ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.3$: Subsets: Definition $3.2$
- 1971: Patrick J. Murphy and Albert F. Kempf: The New Mathematics Made Simple (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Sets: Subsets
- 1971: Gaisi Takeuti and Wilson M. Zaring: Introduction to Axiomatic Set Theory: $\S 5.9$
- 1972: A.G. Howson: A Handbook of Terms used in Algebra and Analysis ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 2$: Sets and functions: Sets
- 1975: T.S. Blyth: Set Theory and Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$. Sets; inclusion; intersection; union; complementation; number systems
- 1975: Bert Mendelson: Introduction to Topology (3rd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Theory of Sets: $\S 2$: Sets and Subsets
- 1977: Gary Chartrand: Introductory Graph Theory ... (previous) ... (next): Appendix $\text{A}.1$: Sets and Subsets
- 1978: John S. Rose: A Course on Group Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $0$: Some Conventions and some Basic Facts
- 1978: Thomas A. Whitelaw: An Introduction to Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 6$: Subsets
- 1979: John E. Hopcroft and Jeffrey D. Ullman: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Preliminaries: $1.4$ Set Notation
- 1981: G. de Barra: Measure Theory and Integration ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Preliminaries: $1.1$ Set Theory
- 1981: Murray R. Spiegel: Theory and Problems of Complex Variables (SI ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1$: Complex Numbers: Point Sets: $14.$
- 1982: P.M. Cohn: Algebra Volume 1 (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Sets and mappings: $\S 1.2$: Sets
- 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein: Dictionary of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): inclusion
- 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein: Dictionary of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): proper: 1.
- 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein: Dictionary of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): subset or subclass
- 1993: Keith Devlin: The Joy of Sets: Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: Naive Set Theory: $\S 1.1$: What is a Set?
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): proper subset (proper subclass)
- 1999: András Hajnal and Peter Hamburger: Set Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $1$. Notation, Conventions: $5$
- 2000: James R. Munkres: Topology (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1$: Set Theory and Logic: $\S 1$: Fundamental Concepts
- 2002: Thomas Jech: Set Theory (3rd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Power Set
- 2008: Paul Halmos and Steven Givant: Introduction to Boolean Algebras ... (previous) ... (next): Appendix $\text{A}$: Set Theory: Sets and Subsets
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): proper subset (proper subclass)
- 2012: M. Ben-Ari: Mathematical Logic for Computer Science (3rd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Appendix $\text{A}.2$: Definition $\text{A}.3$
- 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): proper subset
- 2021: Richard Earl and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (6th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): proper subset