Definition:Antisymmetric Relation/Definition 1
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Definition
Let $S$ be a set.
Let $\RR \subseteq S \times S$ be a relation in $S$.
$\RR$ is antisymmetric if and only if:
- $\tuple {x, y} \in \RR \land \tuple {y, x} \in \RR \implies x = y$
that is:
- $\set {\tuple {x, y}, \tuple {y, x} } \subseteq \RR \implies x = y$
Also known as
Some sources render antisymmetric relation as anti-symmetric relation.
Antisymmetric and Asymmetric Relations
Note the difference between:
- An asymmetric relation, in which the fact that $\tuple {x, y} \in \RR$ means that $\tuple {y, x}$ is definitely not in $\RR$
and:
- An antisymmetric relation, in which there may be instances of both $\tuple {x, y} \in \RR$ and $\tuple {y, x} \in \RR$ but if there are, then it means that $x$ and $y$ have to be the same object.
Examples
Ordering of Integers
The usual ordering $\le$ on the set of integers $\Z$ is antisymmetric:
- $\forall x, y \in \Z: \paren {x \le y} \land \paren {y \le x} \iff x = y$
Set Inclusion
The subset relation is antisymmetric:
- $\paren {x \subseteq y} \land \paren {y \subseteq x} \iff x = y$
where $x$ and $y$ are sets.
Partial Ordering
Let $\preccurlyeq$ be a partial ordering on a set $S$.
Then $\preccurlyeq$ is an antisymmetric relation on $S$.
Also see
- Results about antisymmetric relations can be found here.
Sources
- 1960: Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 14$: Order
- 1965: E.J. Lemmon: Beginning Logic ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $4$: The Predicate Calculus $2$: $5$ Properties of Relations
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {III}$: The Natural Numbers: $\S 14$: Orderings
- 1968: A.N. Kolmogorov and S.V. Fomin: Introductory Real Analysis ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 3.1$: Partially ordered sets
- 1971: Robert H. Kasriel: Undergraduate Topology ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.19$: Some Important Properties of Relations: Definition $19.2$
- 1972: A.G. Howson: A Handbook of Terms used in Algebra and Analysis ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 3$: Equivalence relations and quotient sets: Binary relations
- 1975: T.S. Blyth: Set Theory and Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$. Sets; inclusion; intersection; union; complementation; number systems: Theorem $1.1 \ \text{(c)}$
- 1975: T.S. Blyth: Set Theory and Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 6$. Indexed families; partitions; equivalence relations: $\text{(c)}$
- 1982: P.M. Cohn: Algebra Volume 1 (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Sets and mappings: $\S 1.5$: Ordered Sets: $\mathbf{E}. \, 4$
- 1996: Winfried Just and Martin Weese: Discovering Modern Set Theory. I: The Basics ... (previous) ... (next): Part $1$: Not Entirely Naive Set Theory: Chapter $1$: Pairs, Relations, and Functions
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): symmetric relation
- 2008: Paul Halmos and Steven Givant: Introduction to Boolean Algebras ... (previous) ... (next): Appendix $\text{A}$: Set Theory: Relations
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): symmetric relation
- 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): antisymmetric relation
- 2021: Richard Earl and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (6th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): antisymmetric relation