Definition:Argument of Complex Number
Definition
Let $z = x + i y$ be a complex number.
An argument of $z$, or $\arg z$, is formally defined as a solution to the pair of equations:
- $(1): \quad \dfrac x {\cmod z} = \map \cos {\arg z}$
- $(2): \quad \dfrac y {\cmod z} = \map \sin {\arg z}$
where $\cmod z$ is the modulus of $z$.
From Sine and Cosine are Periodic on Reals, it follows that if $\theta$ is an argument of $z$, then so is $\theta + 2 k \pi$ where $k \in \Z$ is any integer.
Thus, the argument of a complex number $z$ is a continuous multifunction.
![]() | This article, or a section of it, needs explaining. In particular: what does it mean for a multifunction to be continuous? You can help $\mathsf{Pr} \infty \mathsf{fWiki}$ by explaining it. To discuss this page in more detail, feel free to use the talk page. When this work has been completed, you may remove this instance of {{Explain}} from the code. |
Principal Range
It is understood that the argument of a complex number $z$ is unique only up to multiples of $2 k \pi$.
With this understanding, we can limit the choice of what $\theta$ can be for any given $z$ by requiring that $\theta$ lie in some half open interval of length $2 \pi$.
The most usual of these are:
- $\hointr 0 {2 \pi}$
- $\hointl {-\pi} \pi$
but in theory any such interval may be used.
This interval is known as the principal range.
Principal Argument
Let $R$ be the principal range of the complex numbers $\C$.
The unique value of $\theta$ in $R$ is known as the principal argument, of $z$.
This is denoted $\Arg z$.
Note the capital $A$.
The standard practice is for $R$ to be $\hointl {-\pi} \pi$.
This ensures that the principal argument is continuous on the real axis for positive numbers.
Thus, if $z$ is represented in the complex plane, the principal argument $\Arg z$ is intuitively defined as the angle which $z$ yields with the real ($y = 0$) axis.
Warning: Flawed Definition
It appears at first glance that it would be simpler to define the argument of a complex number $z = x + i y$ as:
- $\theta = \arg z := \map \arctan {\dfrac y x}$
This arises from the definition of the tangent as sine divided by cosine.
This, however, does not determine $\theta$ uniquely.
The image set of $\arctan$ is usually defined as:
- $\openint {-\dfrac \pi 2} {\dfrac \pi 2}$
and in any case, is a open interval of length $\pi$.
As the image set of $\arg z$ is $2 \pi$, that means that there are in general two values of $z$ which have the same $\arctan$ value.
Some more superficial sources gloss over this point, and merely suggest that $\arg z$ is one of the two values of $\map \arctan {\dfrac y x}$.
Also known as
The argument of a complex number is also seen as:
Examples
Example: $\arg 3$
- $\arg 3 = 0$
Example: $\map \arg {-3}$
- $\map \arg {-3} = \pi$
Example: $\map \arg {1 + i}$
- $\map \arg {1 + i} = \dfrac \pi 4$
Example: $\map \arg {-1 - i}$
- $\map \arg {-1 - i} = -\dfrac {3 \pi} 4$
Example: $\map \arg {2 i}$
- $\map \arg {2 i} = \dfrac \pi 2$
Example: $\map \arg {-i}$
- $\map \arg {-i} = -\dfrac \pi 2$
Also see
- Results about the argument of a complex number can be found here.
Sources
- 1960: Walter Ledermann: Complex Numbers ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 2$. Geometrical Representations: $(2.10)$
- 1957: E.G. Phillips: Functions of a Complex Variable (8th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text I$: Functions of a Complex Variable: $\S 3$. Geometric Representation of Complex Numbers
- 1964: Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun: Handbook of Mathematical Functions ... (previous) ... (next): $3$: Elementary Analytic Methods: $3.7$ Complex Numbers and Functions: Polar Form: $3.7.4$: Argument
- 1968: Murray R. Spiegel: Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 6$: Complex Numbers: Polar Form of a Complex Number: $6.6$
- 1981: Murray R. Spiegel: Theory and Problems of Complex Variables (SI ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1$: Complex Numbers: Polar Form of Complex Numbers
- 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein: Dictionary of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): argument: 2.
- 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein: Dictionary of Mathematics ... (previous) ... (next): phase
- 1990: H.A. Priestley: Introduction to Complex Analysis (revised ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1$ The complex plane: Complex numbers $\S 1.1$ Complex numbers and their representation
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): argument: 1. (amplitude)
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): complex number
- 1998: Yoav Peleg, Reuven Pnini and Elyahu Zaarur: Quantum Mechanics ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $2$: Mathematical Background: $2.1$ The Complex Field $C$
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): argument: 1. (amplitude)
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): complex number
- 2009: Murray R. Spiegel, Seymour Lipschutz and John Liu: Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables (3rd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 4$: Complex Numbers: Polar Form of Complex Numbers: $4.7.$
- 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): argument
- 2021: Richard Earl and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (6th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): argument (of a complex number)