# Definition:Divisor (Algebra)

## Definition

### Ring with Unity

Let $\struct {R, +, \circ}$ be an ring with unity whose zero is $0_R$ and whose unity is $1_R$.

Let $x, y \in D$.

We define the term **$x$ divides $y$ in $R$** as follows:

- $x \mathrel {\divides_R} y \iff \exists t \in R: y = t \circ x$

When no ambiguity results, the subscript is usually dropped, and **$x$ divides $y$ in $R$** is just written $x \divides y$.

### Natural Numbers

Let $\N$ be the natural numbers.

Let $n \in \N$ and $m \in \N_{>0}$.

Then **$m$ divides $n$** is defined as:

- $m \divides n \iff \exists p \in \N: m \times p = n$

### Integers

As the set of integers form an integral domain, the concept **divides** is fully applicable to the integers.

Let $\struct {\Z, +, \times}$ be the ring of integers.

Let $x, y \in \Z$.

Then **$x$ divides $y$** is defined as:

- $x \divides y \iff \exists t \in \Z: y = t \times x$

### Gaussian Integers

As the set of Gaussian integers form an integral domain, the concept **divides** is also fully applicable to the Gaussian integers.

Let $\struct {\Z \sqbrk i, +, \times}$ be the ring of Gaussian integers.

Let $x, y \in \Z \sqbrk i$.

Then **$x$ divides $y$** is defined as:

- $x \divides y \iff \exists t \in \Z \sqbrk i: y = t \times x$

### Real Numbers

The concept of **divisibility** can also be applied to the real numbers $\R$.

Let $\R$ be the set of real numbers.

Let $x, y \in \R$.

Then **$x$ divides $y$** is defined as:

- $x \divides y \iff \exists t \in \Z: y = t \times x$

where $\Z$ is the set of integers.

## Terminology

Let $x \divides y$ denote that **$x$ divides $y$**.

Then the following terminology can be used:

In the field of Euclidean geometry, in particular:

- $x$
**measures**$y$.

To indicate that $x$ does *not* divide $y$, we write $x \nmid y$.

## Factorization

Let $x, y \in D$ where $\struct {D, +, \times}$ is an integral domain.

Let $x$ be a divisor of $y$.

Then by definition it is possible to find some $t \in D$ such that $y = t \times x$.

The act of breaking down such a $y$ into the product $t \circ x$ is called **factorization**.

## Also known as

A **divisor** can also be referred to as a **factor**.

If $x \divides y$, then $x$ may also be referred to as an **aliquot part** of $y$.

Some sources insist that $x$ must be a proper divisor of $y$ for this term to apply.

If $x \nmid y$, then $x$ may be referred to as an **aliquant part**.

## Notation

The conventional notation for **$x$ is a divisor of $y$** is "$x \mid y$", but there is a growing trend to follow the notation "$x \divides y$", as espoused by Knuth etc.

From Ronald L. Graham, Donald E. Knuth and Oren Patashnik: *Concrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science* (2nd ed.):

*The notation '$m \mid n$' is actually much more common than '$m \divides n$' in current mathematics literature. But vertical lines are overused -- for absolute values, set delimiters, conditional probabilities, etc. -- and backward slashes are underused. Moreover, '$m \divides n$' gives an impression that $m$ is the denominator of an implied ratio. So we shall boldly let our divisibility symbol lean leftward.*

An unfortunate unwelcome side-effect of this notational convention is that to indicate non-divisibility, the conventional technique of implementing $/$ through the notation looks awkward with $\divides$, so $\not \! \backslash$ is eschewed in favour of $\nmid$.

Some sources use $\ \vert \mkern -10mu {\raise 3pt -} \ $ or similar to denote non-divisibility.

## Also see

- Results about
**divisibility**can be found**here**.

## Sources

- 1989: Ephraim J. Borowski and Jonathan M. Borwein:
*Dictionary of Mathematics*:**aliquot part, aliquant part** - 1998: David Nelson:
*The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics*(2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next):**factor** - 2008: David Nelson:
*The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics*(4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next):**factor**:**1.**