Definition:Integer/Formal Definition
Definition
Let $\struct {\N, +}$ be the commutative semigroup of natural numbers under addition.
From Inverse Completion of Natural Numbers, we can create $\struct {\N', +'}$, an inverse completion of $\struct {\N, +}$.
From Construction of Inverse Completion, this is done as follows:
Let $\boxtimes$ be the cross-relation defined on $\N \times \N$ by:
- $\tuple {x_1, y_1} \boxtimes \tuple {x_2, y_2} \iff x_1 + y_2 = x_2 + y_1$
From Cross-Relation is Congruence Relation, $\boxtimes$ is a congruence relation.
Let $\struct {\N \times \N, \oplus}$ be the external direct product of $\struct {\N, +}$ with itself, where $\oplus$ is the operation on $\N \times \N$ induced by $+$ on $\N$:
- $\tuple {x_1, y_1} \oplus \tuple {x_2, y_2} = \tuple {x_1 + x_2, y_1 + y_2}$
Let the quotient structure defined by $\boxtimes$ be $\struct {\dfrac {\N \times \N} \boxtimes, \oplus_\boxtimes}$
where $\oplus_\boxtimes$ is the operation induced on $\dfrac {\N \times \N} \boxtimes$ by $\oplus$.
Let us use $\N'$ to denote the quotient set $\dfrac {\N \times \N} \boxtimes$.
Let us use $+'$ to denote the operation $\oplus_\boxtimes$.
Thus $\struct {\N', +'}$ is the Inverse Completion of Natural Numbers.
As the Inverse Completion is Unique up to isomorphism, it follows that we can define the structure $\struct {\Z, +}$ which is isomorphic to $\struct {\N', +'}$.
An element of $\N'$ is therefore an equivalence class of the congruence relation $\boxtimes$.
So an element of $\Z$ is the isomorphic image of an element $\eqclass {\tuple {a, b} } \boxtimes$ of $\dfrac {\N \times \N} \boxtimes$.
The set of elements $\Z$ is called the integers.
Natural Number Difference
In the context of the natural numbers, the difference is defined as:
- $n - m = p \iff m + p = n$
from which it can be seen that the above congruence can be understood as:
- $\tuple {x_1, y_1} \boxtimes \tuple {x_2, y_2} \iff x_1 + y_2 = x_2 + y_1 \iff x_1 - y_1 = x_2 - y_2$
Thus this congruence defines an equivalence between pairs of elements which have the same difference.
Notation
We have that $\eqclass {\tuple {a, b} } \boxminus$ is an equivalence class of ordered pairs of natural numbers under the congruence relation $\boxminus$.
As this notation is cumbersome, it is commonplace though technically incorrect to streamline it to $\eqclass {a, b} \boxminus$, or $\eqclass {a, b} {}$.
This is generally considered acceptable, as long as it is made explicit as to the precise meaning of $\eqclass {a, b} {}$ at the start of any exposition.
Sources
- 1951: Nathan Jacobson: Lectures in Abstract Algebra: Volume $\text { I }$: Basic Concepts ... (previous) ... (next): Introduction $\S 5$: The system of integers
- 1965: Seth Warner: Modern Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text {IV}$: Rings and Fields: $\S 20$: The Integers
- 1972: A.G. Howson: A Handbook of Terms used in Algebra and Analysis ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 4$: Number systems $\text{I}$: The rational integers