Definition:Biconditional
Definition
The biconditional is a binary connective:
- $p \iff q$
defined as:
- $\paren {p \implies q} \land \paren {q \implies p}$
That is:
- If $p$ is true, then $q$ is true, and if $q$ is true, then $p$ is true.
$p \iff q$ can be voiced:
- $p$ if and only if $q$.
Truth Function
The biconditional connective defines the truth function $f^\leftrightarrow$ as follows:
\(\ds \map {f^\leftrightarrow} {\F, \F}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \T\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \map {f^\leftrightarrow} {\F, \T}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \F\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \map {f^\leftrightarrow} {\T, \F}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \F\) | ||||||||||||
\(\ds \map {f^\leftrightarrow} {\T, \T}\) | \(=\) | \(\ds \T\) |
Truth Table
The characteristic truth table of the biconditional operator $p \iff q$ is as follows:
- $\begin{array}{|cc||c|} \hline p & q & p \iff q \\ \hline \F & \F & \T \\ \F & \T & \F \\ \T & \F & \F \\ \T & \T & \T \\ \hline \end{array}$
Boolean Interpretation
The truth value of $\mathbf A \iff \mathbf B$ under a boolean interpretation $v$ is given by:
- $\map v {\mathbf A \iff \mathbf B} = \begin{cases} \T & \text{if } \map v {\mathbf A} = \map v {\mathbf B} \\ \F & \text{otherwise} \end{cases}$
Semantics of the Biconditional
The concept of the biconditional has been defined such that $p \iff q$ means:
- If $p$ is true then $q$ is true, and if $q$ is true then $p$ is true.
$p \iff q$ can be considered as a shorthand to replace the use of the longer and more unwieldy expression involving two conditionals and a conjunction.
If we refer to ways of expressing the conditional, we see that:
- $q \implies p$ can be interpreted as $p$ is true if $q$ is true
and:
- $p \implies q$ can be interpreted as $p$ is true only if $q$ is true.
Thus we arrive at the usual way of reading $p \iff q$ which is: $p$ is true if and only if $q$ is true.
This can also be said as:
- The truth value of $p$ is equivalent to the truth value of $q$.
- $p$ is equivalent to $q$.
- $p$ and $q$ are equivalent.
- $p$ and $q$ are coimplicant.
- $p$ and $q$ are logically equivalent.
- $p$ and $q$ are materially equivalent.
- $p$ is true exactly when $q$ is true.
- $p$ is true iff $q$ is true. This is another convenient and useful (if informal) shorthand which is catching on in the mathematical community.
Also known as
Other names for the biconditional include:
Notational Variants
Various symbols are encountered that denote the concept of biconditionality:
Symbol | Origin |
---|---|
$p \iff q$ | |
$p\ \mathsf{EQ} \ q$ | |
$p \equiv q$ | 1910: Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell: Principia Mathematica |
$p = q$ | |
$p \leftrightarrow q$ | |
$\operatorname E p q$ | Łukasiewicz's Polish notation |
It is usual in mathematics to use $\iff$, as there are other uses for the other symbols.
Examples
Monday iff Tomorrow Tuesday
The following is an example of a biconditional statement:
- Either today is Monday if and only if today is the day before Tuesday.
Also see
- Results about the biconditional can be found here.
Sources
- 1910: Alfred North Whitehead and Bertrand Russell: Principia Mathematica: Volume $\text { 1 }$ ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $\text{I}$: Preliminary Explanations of Ideas and Notations
- 1946: Alfred Tarski: Introduction to Logic and to the Methodology of Deductive Sciences (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S \text{II}.10$: Equivalence of sentences
- 1959: A.H. Basson and D.J. O'Connor: Introduction to Symbolic Logic (3rd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 2.5$: Further Logical Constants
- 1960: Paul R. Halmos: Naive Set Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 2$: The Axiom of Specification
- 1961: David V. Widder: Advanced Calculus (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1$ Partial Differentiation: $\S 2$. Functions of One Variable: $2.1$ Limits and Continuity
- 1963: George F. Simmons: Introduction to Topology and Modern Analysis ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: Sets and Set Inclusion
- 1964: Donald Kalish and Richard Montague: Logic: Techniques of Formal Reasoning ... (previous) ... (next): $\text{II}$: 'AND', 'OR', 'IF AND ONLY IF': $\S 1$
- 1964: William K. Smith: Limits and Continuity ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 2.1$: Sets
- 1965: Claude Berge and A. Ghouila-Houri: Programming, Games and Transportation Networks ... (previous) ... (next): $1$. Preliminary ideas; sets, vector spaces: $1.1$. Sets
- 1965: J.A. Green: Sets and Groups ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.2$. Subsets
- 1965: E.J. Lemmon: Beginning Logic ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: The Propositional Calculus $1$: $4$ The Biconditional
- 1967: George McCarty: Topology: An Introduction with Application to Topological Groups ... (previous) ... (next): Introduction: Special Symbols
- 1971: Robert H. Kasriel: Undergraduate Topology ... (previous) ... (next): $\S1.2$: Some Remarks on the Use of the Connectives and, or, implies: Definition $2.1$
- 1972: A.G. Howson: A Handbook of Terms used in Algebra and Analysis ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: Some mathematical language: Connectives
- 1972: Patrick Suppes: Axiomatic Set Theory (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.2$ Logic and Notation
- 1973: Irving M. Copi: Symbolic Logic (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $2$ Arguments Containing Compound Statements: $2.4$: Statement Forms
- 1975: T.S. Blyth: Set Theory and Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$. Sets; inclusion; intersection; union; complementation; number systems
- 1977: Gary Chartrand: Introductory Graph Theory ... (previous) ... (next): Appendix $\text{A}.5$: Theorems and Proofs
- 1978: Thomas A. Whitelaw: An Introduction to Abstract Algebra ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 4$: The implies sign ($\Rightarrow$)
- 1979: G.H. Hardy and E.M. Wright: An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Remarks on Notation
- 1980: D.J. O'Connor and Betty Powell: Elementary Logic ... (previous) ... (next): $\S \text{I}: 2$: Logical Constants $(1)$
- 1982: P.M. Cohn: Algebra Volume 1 (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Sets and mappings: $\S 1.1$: The need for logic
- 1988: Alan G. Hamilton: Logic for Mathematicians (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: Informal statement calculus: $\S 1.1$: Statements and connectives
- 1993: M. Ben-Ari: Mathematical Logic for Computer Science ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $2$: Propositional Calculus: $\S 2.1$: Boolean operators
- 1993: Keith Devlin: The Joy of Sets: Fundamentals of Contemporary Set Theory (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1$: Naive Set Theory: $\S 1.1$: What is a Set?
- 1996: H. Jerome Keisler and Joel Robbin: Mathematical Logic and Computability ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.1$: Introduction
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): biconditional (in logic)
- 1998: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): equivalence: 1. (material)
- 1999: András Hajnal and Peter Hamburger: Set Theory ... (previous) ... (next): $1$. Notation, Conventions
- 2000: Michael R.A. Huth and Mark D. Ryan: Logic in Computer Science: Modelling and reasoning about systems ... (previous) ... (next): $\S 1.2.5$: An aside: proof by contradiction: Exercises $1.6: \ 7$
- 2000: James R. Munkres: Topology (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): $1$: Set Theory and Logic: $\S 1$: Fundamental Concepts
- 2008: David Joyner: Adventures in Group Theory (2nd ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: Elementary, my dear Watson: $\S 1.1$: You have a logical mind if...
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): biconditional (in logic)
- 2008: David Nelson: The Penguin Dictionary of Mathematics (4th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): equivalence: 1. (material)
- 2010: Raymond M. Smullyan and Melvin Fitting: Set Theory and the Continuum Problem (revised ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): Chapter $1$: General Background: $\S 6$ Significance of the results
- 2014: Christopher Clapham and James Nicholson: The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Mathematics (5th ed.) ... (previous) ... (next): implication